MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 2005

[Quality evaluation of neonatal transports].

Meberg Alf, Hansen Thor Willy Ruud

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Neonatal transports carry risk of complications and technical mishaps which may cause deterioration of the patient's condition.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Prospective observational study on all transports from the subregional neonatal unit, Vestfold Hospital, Norway to other hospitals during the 23-year period 1982-2004.

RESULTS

396 transports were undertaken with a total of 359 patients, 0.7% of live born infants (n = 49,250). Indications were prematurity/respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in 84 (21%), congenital malformations in 188 (47%), and other conditions in 124 (31%). After the establishment a local respirator programme 1989, transports for prematurity/RDS declined significantly from the 7-year period 1982 - 88 to the 16-year period 1989-2004 (3.4 vs. 1.0 per 1000 live born infants ;p < 0.0001). Night-time transports declined by 55 %. Technical mishaps occurred in 4% of the transports. No deaths occurred during transport; however, 10 infants (2.8%) died within 24 hours on arrival.

INTERPRETATION: Neonatal transports were associated with risk of deterioration. High local competence and up-to-date technical equipment for neonatal intensive care improve the quality of transport, reduce the incidence of transports of premature infants with RDS, and of transports during night-time.

Для цитирования: Meberg Alf, Hansen Thor Willy Ruud. [Quality evaluation of neonatal transports].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.