DOI 10.1016/j.oftale.2026.502591
Bacterial contamination map of high-touch surfaces in a hospital ophthalmology department: A cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Bacterial contamination of high-touch surfaces can facilitate healthcare-associated infections, particularly in ophthalmology, where frequent contact with diagnostic devices occurs. The aim of this study was to evaluate and characterize bacterial load on high-touch surfaces in a hospital ophthalmology department, identifying critical areas and predominant bacterial groups.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Cross-sectional observational study conducted in a tertiary hospital, sampling 150 surfaces across consultation rooms, emergency areas, waiting rooms, administrative areas, and critical points. Surfaces were sampled using sterile swabs and cultured on nutrient agar. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, bacterial load was quantified as colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm²). Bacterial identification was performed using Gram staining and conventional biochemical tests. Comparisons between areas were analyzed using ANOVA; P < .05.
RESULTS
Significant differences in bacterial load were observed among areas; P < .001, with higher values in consultation rooms (104 ± 37 CFU/cm²) and critical points (118 ± 42 CFU/cm²). The most contaminated surfaces were slit-lamp chin rests, keyboards and mice, touch screens, and tonometer cones. Coagulase-negative staphylococci predominated (79%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (14%) and Gram-negative bacilli (9%).
CONCLUSIONS
Frequently touched surfaces in ophthalmology departments exhibit high bacterial loads, underscoring the need for differentiated cleaning protocols, periodic audits, and staff training to reduce cross-contamination and improve patient safety.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.