DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110403
Focal cortical dysplasia detection by artificial intelligence using MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a common cause of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. However, it can be challenging to detect FCD using MRI alone. This study aimed to review and analyze studies that used machine learning and artificial neural networks (ANN) methods as an additional tool to enhance MRI findings in FCD patients.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-AI, and a bivariate random-effects model was used for analysis. The main outcome analyzed was the sensitivity and specificity of patient-wise outcomes. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I2.
RESULTS
A total of 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 24 ANN-based studies and 17 machine learning studies. Meta-analysis of internal validation datasets showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.92 for AI-based models in detecting FCD lesions. Meta-analysis of external validation datasets yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.66. There was moderate heterogeneity among studies in the external validation dataset, but no significant publication bias was found.
CONCLUSION
Although there is an increasing number of machine learning and ANN-based models for FCD detection, their clinical applicability remains limited. Further refinement and optimization, along with longitudinal studies, are needed to ensure their integration into clinical practice. Addressing the identified limitations and intensifying research efforts will improve their relevance and reliability in real medical scenarios.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.