Ophthalmic research · 2020
Cerebral Neurovascular Coupling Impairment in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Penas Susana, Castro Pedro, Pereira Gilberto, Oliveira Ana Marta, Carneiro Angela M, Rocha-Sousa Amândio, Azevedo Elsa, Falcão-Reis Fernando M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a chorioretinal disorder resulting from choroidal hyperpermeability. Its comorbidities as hypertension, coronary disease, and psychological stress, suggest that it might reflect a more generalized vascular dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the cerebrovascular regulation integrity, using cerebral autoregulation (CA), carbon dioxide vasoreactivity (VR), and neurovascular coupling (NVC) in CSCR.
METHODS: This observational pilot study included 20 CSCR patients and 14 age- and sex-matched controls. A State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) inquiry was full-filled. Continuous measurement of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide was performed. VR was assessed during hypercapnia (inhaling carbogen gas) and hypnocapnia (hyperventilation). For NVC, the CBFV relative increase during mental activation using the N-Back Task was calculated.
RESULTS: No significant differences in systemic hemodynamic parameters, CA or VR, were found between both groups. During the NVC performance, the average CBFV rise during mental stress was significantly lower in CSCR (p = 0.011). A significant negative correlation was found between STAI scores and NVC.
CONCLUSIONS: CSCR patients presented a significantly impaired cerebral NVC compared to controls, supporting the theory of a potential systemic vascular dysfunction. Stress could be related to this NVC impairment.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the cerebrovascular regulation integrity, using cerebral autoregulation (CA), carbon dioxide vasoreactivity (VR), and neurovascular coupling (NVC) in CSCR.
METHODS: This observational pilot study included 20 CSCR patients and 14 age- and sex-matched controls. A State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) inquiry was full-filled. Continuous measurement of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide was performed. VR was assessed during hypercapnia (inhaling carbogen gas) and hypnocapnia (hyperventilation). For NVC, the CBFV relative increase during mental activation using the N-Back Task was calculated.
RESULTS: No significant differences in systemic hemodynamic parameters, CA or VR, were found between both groups. During the NVC performance, the average CBFV rise during mental stress was significantly lower in CSCR (p = 0.011). A significant negative correlation was found between STAI scores and NVC.
CONCLUSIONS: CSCR patients presented a significantly impaired cerebral NVC compared to controls, supporting the theory of a potential systemic vascular dysfunction. Stress could be related to this NVC impairment.