MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.012

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of plastic surgery · 2005

Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model.

Macleod T M, Williams G, Sanders R, Green C J

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study assessed the suitability of Permacol (a porcine derived, isocyanate cross linked collagen based biomaterial) as an alternative to autologous tissue in soft tissue reconstruction. The Sprague-Dawley rat was used as a model for subcutaneous implantation over a 20 week period and comparison made with two other porcine biomaterials (small intestinal submucosa and glycerol treated-ethylene oxide sterilised porcine dermis). Implants were scored histometrically on the degree of acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, fibrosis and stromal response. The vascularity and percentage composition of collagen within Permacol were assessed by stereology and seescan image analysis, respectively. In general terms, Permacol was well tolerated as a subcutaneous implant, with only a minor chronic inflammatory response remaining after a 20 week period of implantation. There was evidence of collagen degradation during this period and vascular ingrowth into Permacol was limited. Permacol has the potential for a broad range of applications in plastic surgery, but may benefit from modification to promote a more rapid degree of vascularisation.

Для цитирования: Macleod T M, Williams G, Sanders R, Green C J. Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model.. British journal of plastic surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.