Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026
Review Article: Implementation Challenges in Helicobacter pylori Management: Bridging Evidence and Real-World Practice.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quach Duc Trong, Liou Jyh-Ming, Gisbert Javier P, Leung Wai Keung, Moss Steven F, Fallone Carlo A, Katelaris Peter, Schulz Christian, Kayamba Violet, Zhou Liya, Vu Nhu Thi Hanh, Vilaichone Ratha-Korn, Miftahussurur Muhammad, Setshedi Mashiko, Riquelme Arnoldo, Yadegar Abbas, Lee Yeong Yeh, Ishibashi Fumiaki, Jung Hwoon-Yong, Coelho Luiz Gonzaga, Suzuki Hidekazu, Lee Yi-Chia, Megraud Francis, Mahachai Varocha, Sugano Kentaro, Malfertheiner Peter
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite increasingly refined diagnostic strategies and regularly updated treatment guidelines, real-world outcomes of Helicobacter pylori management remain variable. Antimicrobial resistance alone does not fully explain these discrepancies, suggesting important challenges in the implementation of evidence-based care.
AIMS: To identify recurring implementation-related challenges across the Helicobacter pylori care pathway and highlight priorities for improving real-world management.
METHODS: This expert-informed review integrated relevant literature, international guideline documents, and structured international expert prioritisation. An initial list of implementation-related pitfalls was developed through literature review, clinical experience, and discussions among the coordinating authors and selected co-authors. Twenty-six experts from five continents participated in a structured consultation process and rated predefined pitfalls using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores were used for relative prioritisation.
RESULTS: Treatment selection and patient management emerged as the domains most consistently prioritised by participating experts. High-impact pitfalls included empirical triple therapy in high-resistance settings, inadequate patient counselling, and empirical retreatment without escalation. Additional challenges were identified across diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up domains, highlighting persistent implementation-related barriers throughout the care pathway.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurring implementation-related challenges remain important barriers to optimal Helicobacter pylori management. Structured expert prioritisation highlights potential targets for improvement and supports further research and implementation-focused strategies to improve delivery of care.
AIMS: To identify recurring implementation-related challenges across the Helicobacter pylori care pathway and highlight priorities for improving real-world management.
METHODS: This expert-informed review integrated relevant literature, international guideline documents, and structured international expert prioritisation. An initial list of implementation-related pitfalls was developed through literature review, clinical experience, and discussions among the coordinating authors and selected co-authors. Twenty-six experts from five continents participated in a structured consultation process and rated predefined pitfalls using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores were used for relative prioritisation.
RESULTS: Treatment selection and patient management emerged as the domains most consistently prioritised by participating experts. High-impact pitfalls included empirical triple therapy in high-resistance settings, inadequate patient counselling, and empirical retreatment without escalation. Additional challenges were identified across diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up domains, highlighting persistent implementation-related barriers throughout the care pathway.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurring implementation-related challenges remain important barriers to optimal Helicobacter pylori management. Structured expert prioritisation highlights potential targets for improvement and supports further research and implementation-focused strategies to improve delivery of care.