DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.07.016
An Atypical Course of Visceral Leishmaniasis After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report From Iran.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Organ transplantation can lead to human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) transmission in humans. This report aims to describe the possible complications related to an atypical course of VL after kidney transplantation.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old man who suffered end-stage renal failure received a deceased donor kidney transplant after 2 years of hemodialysis. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone were used for immunosuppressive therapy, and renal function remained stable for 2.5 years. He was referred to our hospital because of fever and malaise. Physical and radiological examinations showed mild splenomegaly and cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Laboratory data showed bicytopenia, elevated C-reactive protein, serum creatinine, and non-nephrotic proteinuria. Bone marrow biopsy aspiration showed no abnormality. Polymerase chain reaction confirmed the diagnosis of Leishmania infantum. Anti-leishmanial therapy was initiated with liposomal amphotericin B for 2 weeks, and the patient became clinically stable. So far, there has been no evidence of clinical or biological relapse, and kidney function is stable.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering that VL has become increasingly widespread in immunocompromised patients in endemic regions, especially in patients with transplants, it is crucial to screen and rule out VL as a cause of infection in these patients. The probability of this problem should be considered in every patient with a transplant in endemic and nonendemic areas. Furthermore, our study showed that through timely diagnosis using noninvasive methods and standard treatments, mortality caused by this disease can be properly prevented.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.