Sexually transmitted infections · 2024
Seroconversion in syphilis screening without positive confirmatory tests points at early infection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nieuwenburg Silvia Achia, Jongen Vita Willemijn, Schim van der Loeff Maarten, de Vries Henry, van Dam Alje
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) is a widely used screening test for syphilis. A CLIA seroconversion in the absence of a positive line immunoassay (LIA) or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) could indicate either an early incubating syphilis or a false positive result. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of such seroconversions.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of clients visiting the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam between July 2013 and August 2021 with a positive CLIA and a negative RPR and negative or indeterminate LIA (at time To), and a preceding visit (T-1) with a negative CLIA <6 months of To ('unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion'). If available, data of follow-up visits (T1) <2 months of To were also included. A syphilis diagnosis was confirmed if darkfield microscopy or PCR for Treponema pallidum was positive at T0 or T1, or if RPR and/or LIA were positive at T1.
RESULTS: We included data of 107 clients with unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion. The value of CLIA seroconversion could not be established in 13 (12.1%) clients. In the remaining 94 clients, the unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion was confirmed as early syphilis in 72 (76.6%) clients and probable syphilis in 6 (6.4%) clients. In 16 (17.0%) clients, the unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion was regarded as a false positive reaction of whom 4 (5.3%) clients had a seroreversion of the CLIA at T1.
CONCLUSION: The majority of unconfirmed CLIA seroconversions represented early syphilis infections. Therefore, additional T. pallidum PCR, a follow-up consultation or early treatment is recommended.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of clients visiting the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam between July 2013 and August 2021 with a positive CLIA and a negative RPR and negative or indeterminate LIA (at time To), and a preceding visit (T-1) with a negative CLIA <6 months of To ('unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion'). If available, data of follow-up visits (T1) <2 months of To were also included. A syphilis diagnosis was confirmed if darkfield microscopy or PCR for Treponema pallidum was positive at T0 or T1, or if RPR and/or LIA were positive at T1.
RESULTS: We included data of 107 clients with unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion. The value of CLIA seroconversion could not be established in 13 (12.1%) clients. In the remaining 94 clients, the unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion was confirmed as early syphilis in 72 (76.6%) clients and probable syphilis in 6 (6.4%) clients. In 16 (17.0%) clients, the unconfirmed CLIA seroconversion was regarded as a false positive reaction of whom 4 (5.3%) clients had a seroreversion of the CLIA at T1.
CONCLUSION: The majority of unconfirmed CLIA seroconversions represented early syphilis infections. Therefore, additional T. pallidum PCR, a follow-up consultation or early treatment is recommended.