MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-57831-3

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2024

Clinical outcomes of interstitial lung abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seok Jinwoo, Park Shinhee, Yoon Eun Chong, Yoon Hee-Young

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), incidental findings on computed tomography scans, have raised concerns due to their association with worse clinical outcomes. Our meta-analysis, which included studies up to April 2023 from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, aimed to clarify the impact of ILA on mortality, lung cancer development, and complications from lung cancer treatments. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcomes. Analyzing 10 studies on ILA prognosis and 9 on cancer treatment complications, we found that ILA significantly increases the risk of overall mortality (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.94-3.54; I2 = 90%) and lung cancer development (RR 3.85, 95% CI 2.64-5.62; I2 = 22%). Additionally, cancer patients with ILA had higher risks of grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.71-3.03; I2 = 0%) and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.37-6.77; I2 = 83%) compared with those without ILA. In conclusion, ILA significantly associates with increased mortality, lung cancer risk, and cancer treatment-related complications, highlighting the necessity for vigilant patient management and monitoring.

Для цитирования: Seok Jinwoo, Park Shinhee, Yoon Eun Chong, Yoon Hee-Young. Clinical outcomes of interstitial lung abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Scientific reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57831-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.