DOI 10.1080/02688697.2022.2159923
Cerebral syphilitic Gumma in the modern era: a report of an unusual case and brief review of recent published reports.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cerebral syphilitic gummas are rare. However, numerous case reports on them have been published recently, consistent with the resurgence of syphilis and its accompanying atypical manifestations. We here present a patient with a cerebral syphilitic gumma and an unusual clinical course and review recent case reports.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman had a generalised seizure and was found by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to have a brain mass that mimicked a brain abscess or malignant tumour. Further imaging with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography did not contribute further to the differential diagnosis. Because treatment with ceftriaxone was ineffective, the lesion was resected. Serological tests on serum and cerebrospinal fluid were positive for syphilis and histopathological examination of the operative specimen revealed a syphilitic gumma. Antibiotic treatment is preferred over invasive interventions for cerebral syphilitic gumma. However, as in our case, radical resection is required when antibiotic treatment is ineffective.
CONCLUSIONS
It has recently been reported that the prevalence of syphilis is increasing in older individuals, including in patients without HIV infection or prior treatment for early syphilis. Though advanced imaging and molecular biological techniques are often used to help make a diagnosis, they are of limited value. Because the clinical and imaging features are nonspecific, some neurosurgeons do not include cerebral syphilitic gummas in their differential diagnoses. It is vital that this possibility be considered when a patient has a tumour-like cerebral mass and serum positivity for syphilis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.