MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4158/ep.3.2.82

Медицинская библиотека · Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 1997

Magnetic resonance imaging in sheehan's syndrome: case report and literature review of imaging studies.

Scheller T F, Nader S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present the first documentation of pituitary atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient with Sheehan's syndrome and review the published radiologic findings in this syndrome.

METHODS

We describe the clinical and laboratory findings in a young woman with Sheehan's syndrome, provide the MRI results, and discuss the previously published radiologic studies of this syndrome.

RESULTS

A 31-year-old woman, who was examined 11 months after severe postpartum hemorrhage, had clinical and biochemical findings consistent with Sheehan's syndrome (loss of axillary hair, amenorrhea, and impaired pituitary reserve for luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, thyrotropin, growth hormone, and corticotropin). MRI showed a partially empty sella in conjunction with invagination of the optic chiasm anteriorly into the pituitary fossa.

CONCLUSION

Because of its greater spatial resolution, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and potential for multiplanar images, MRI can provide more precise and detailed findings than other radiologic studies and can facilitate diagnosis of Sheehan's syndrome.

Для цитирования: Scheller T F, Nader S. Magnetic resonance imaging in sheehan's syndrome: case report and literature review of imaging studies.. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 1997. DOI: 10.4158/ep.3.2.82.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.