Intensive care medicine · 2025
Maintaining ventilation with very low tidal volume and positive-end expiratory pressure versus no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in adults: a randomized clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tadié Jean-Marc, Ouattara Alexandre, Laviolle Bruno, Lesouhaitier Mathieu, Esvan Maxime, Rousseau Chloé, Grégoire Murielle, Gaudriot Baptiste, Nesseler Nicolas, Labaste François, Sanchez Pascale, Marcheix Bertrand, Beurton Antoine, Dureau Pauline, Demondion Pierre, Fouquet Olivier, Rineau Emmanuel, Amour Julien, Verhoye Jean-Philippe, Mercat Alain, Terzi Nicolas, Tarte Karin, Bouglé Adrien, Flecher Erwan, VECAR Trial Group and REVA
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during cardiac surgery mechanically circulates and oxygenates the blood, bypassing the heart and lungs. Despite limited evidence, maintaining mechanical ventilation (MV) during CPB is recommended, as ventilator strategies during surgery may reduce the occurrence of postoperative infections. We aimed to determine whether maintaining MV for cardiac surgery would decrease postoperative infections compared with stopping MV during CPB.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized trial among adult patients undergoing scheduled cardiac surgery with CPB in six hospitals in France. During CPB, the tracheal tube was disconnected from the ventilator in the control group (MV- group). In the MV + group, ventilation was maintained during CPB with very low tidal volume ventilation, using a tidal volume of 2.5 mL/kg of predicted body weight, with 5-7 cmH2O positive end expiratory pressure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all types of postoperative infections within the first 28 days after surgery. There were six secondary evaluation criteria including the number of days of exposure to antibiotics.
RESULTS: A total of 1362 patients were enrolled in the study. Postoperative infection occurred in 74 out of 680 patients (10.9%) in the MV- group, compared to 68 out of 682 patients (10.0%) in the MV + group (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.25; p = 0.58). Antibiotic use was higher in the MV + group than in the MV- group (incidence risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.15; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between the groups for all other secondary outcomes or for the incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining very low tidal volume ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure during CPB did not reduce postoperative infections at 28 days compared to when mechanical ventilation was stopped during CPB. An unexpectedly higher use of antibiotics was observed when ventilation was maintained.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03372174).
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized trial among adult patients undergoing scheduled cardiac surgery with CPB in six hospitals in France. During CPB, the tracheal tube was disconnected from the ventilator in the control group (MV- group). In the MV + group, ventilation was maintained during CPB with very low tidal volume ventilation, using a tidal volume of 2.5 mL/kg of predicted body weight, with 5-7 cmH2O positive end expiratory pressure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all types of postoperative infections within the first 28 days after surgery. There were six secondary evaluation criteria including the number of days of exposure to antibiotics.
RESULTS: A total of 1362 patients were enrolled in the study. Postoperative infection occurred in 74 out of 680 patients (10.9%) in the MV- group, compared to 68 out of 682 patients (10.0%) in the MV + group (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.25; p = 0.58). Antibiotic use was higher in the MV + group than in the MV- group (incidence risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.15; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between the groups for all other secondary outcomes or for the incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining very low tidal volume ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure during CPB did not reduce postoperative infections at 28 days compared to when mechanical ventilation was stopped during CPB. An unexpectedly higher use of antibiotics was observed when ventilation was maintained.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03372174).