Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025
Evaluating Polo Helmet Performance Across Different Impact Test Systems.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stark Nicole E-P, Begonia Mark T, Rowson Steve
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study evaluated head impact response between different helmet impact test systems by comparing the performance of ten polo helmets.
METHODS: Helmets were evaluated using three test systems: a twin-wire guided drop tower, an oblique drop tower, and an impact pendulum. Impact tests were conducted at matched locations (front boss, side, rear boss) and speeds (3.46, 5.46 m/s). We employed a linear mixed model with helmet model as a random effect and calculated the least square mean differences between systems for peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), peak rotational velocity (PRV), and concussion risk. Correlations between systems by impact speed were explored, using linear models of each system as a function of the others, and calculated Spearman rank correlation coefficients between test systems for each dependent variable.
RESULTS: Our results found distinct differences in PRA and concussion risk between the oblique and the pendulum impact systems due to the driving force. The acceleration range across helmet models was substantial, and responses differed between test systems at matched impact conditions. However, there were similarities between test systems in the rank order of helmet models. Head acceleration differences between helmets translated to larger differences in concussion risk between helmet models.
CONCLUSION: These trends provide a framework for comparing the headform's response across varying loading conditions. When selecting a test system to evaluate helmets for a specific sport, it is essential to consider the relevant impact conditions and loading patterns to ensure that laboratory tests accurately represent real-world scenarios.
METHODS: Helmets were evaluated using three test systems: a twin-wire guided drop tower, an oblique drop tower, and an impact pendulum. Impact tests were conducted at matched locations (front boss, side, rear boss) and speeds (3.46, 5.46 m/s). We employed a linear mixed model with helmet model as a random effect and calculated the least square mean differences between systems for peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), peak rotational velocity (PRV), and concussion risk. Correlations between systems by impact speed were explored, using linear models of each system as a function of the others, and calculated Spearman rank correlation coefficients between test systems for each dependent variable.
RESULTS: Our results found distinct differences in PRA and concussion risk between the oblique and the pendulum impact systems due to the driving force. The acceleration range across helmet models was substantial, and responses differed between test systems at matched impact conditions. However, there were similarities between test systems in the rank order of helmet models. Head acceleration differences between helmets translated to larger differences in concussion risk between helmet models.
CONCLUSION: These trends provide a framework for comparing the headform's response across varying loading conditions. When selecting a test system to evaluate helmets for a specific sport, it is essential to consider the relevant impact conditions and loading patterns to ensure that laboratory tests accurately represent real-world scenarios.