DOI 10.23736/s0392-0488.17.05830-8
Relevance in biology and mechanisms of immune and treatment evasion of Treponema pallidum.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
During syphilis a compelling fight is engaged between the host's humoral and cellular immune responses that work to eliminate the infection and Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum) that manages to evade eradication and cause chronic infection. Different mechanisms are utilized by treponemes to overcome immunological response. Although penicillin (BPG) proved to be effective in quelling the early manifestations of the disease and consequently its contagiousness, questions remain about its ability to prevent the late complications and to provide a microbiological eradication in vivo. In fact, both serological and microbiological failures have been reported following conventional treatment.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reviewed some biologic properties of T. pallidum in order to establish a relationship with the persistence of the infection and the alleged treatment resistance.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The host humoral response, sometimes, may not protect completely against T. pallidum and accounts for the persistent infection and tertiary damages. In fact, the cell mediated response during infection may be downregulate in response to pathogen-derived molecules, or indirectly by generating Treg cells. It is also possible that there are strain types of T. pallidum with higher ability of evasion determining neurosyphilis. In addition, apart the impressive results that BPG has made on the syphilis cutaneous lesions, concerns still remain on its efficacy in preventing late complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding the biology of the T. pallidum may help researchers in this field to develop future target therapies in order to prevent persistent infection and progression of the disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.