MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/bjon.2025.0557

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) · 2025

The contribution of advanced practitioners to equitable and person-centred continence care.

Alsararatee Hasan H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Continence problems remain widespread across community and secondary care, yet provision in the UK continues to be shaped by inequities, fragmented commissioning, stigma and variation in workforce capability. This article examines the contribution of advanced practitioners (APs) to continence care through the four pillars of practice and considers how their clinical expertise, leadership influence, educational role and engagement with research can strengthen assessment, co-ordination and person-centred support. Evidence from national reports and existing studies demonstrates the need for improved pathways, enhanced staff capability and dignity-focused practice, particularly for populations affected by frailty, cognitive impairment, or cultural and communication barriers. By integrating comprehensive assessment, sensitive communication, culturally responsive engagement and informed use of innovation, APs can advance equitable continence provision and improve the lived experience of individuals with bladder and bowel needs. The article concludes that AP-led practice is essential for progressing continence care within a system that requires greater consistency, stronger evaluation and sustained attention to wellbeing and quality of life.

Для цитирования: Alsararatee Hasan H. The contribution of advanced practitioners to equitable and person-centred continence care.. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 2025. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2025.0557.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.