MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2209/tdcpublication.47.19

Медицинская библиотека · The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College · 2006

Two cases with supernumerary teeth in lower incisor region.

Yokose Taishi, Sakamoto Teruo, Sueishi Kenji, Yatabe Kenichi, Tsujino Keiichirou, Kubo Shuhei, Yakushiji Masashi, Yamaguchi Hideharu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Abnormalities in number of teeth are occasionally noted in clinical cases. Many theories have been proposed as regards the causes of the occurrence of supernumerary teeth, including atavism theory, mechanical tooth germ separation theory, tissue induction theory, and dental laminar morphological disturbance theory. However, none of these theories alone offers a sufficient explanation for this phenomenon. The incidence of supernumerary permanent teeth is approximately 1-3%. These are the maxillary anterior teeth, the maxillary molars, and the maxillo-mandibular premolars in terms of descending order of site of occurrence. On the other hand, incidence in the mandibular anterior tooth area, of which there have been few detailed reports, is about 0.01%, a markedly low value. In this paper, we report two rare cases of supernumerary teeth in the mandibular incisor area. We discuss their etiology and orthodontic treatment, and detail a differential diagnosis between the normal and supernumerary teeth. We found that it was difficult to establish a clear etiology and differentiation between the normal and supernumerary teeth.

Для цитирования: Yokose Taishi, Sakamoto Teruo, Sueishi Kenji, Yatabe Kenichi, Tsujino Keiichirou, Kubo Shuhei, Yakushiji Masashi, Yamaguchi Hideharu. Two cases with supernumerary teeth in lower incisor region.. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 2006. DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.47.19.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.