Alternative therapies in health and medicine · 2023
A Case of Maternal Uniparental Disomy of Chromosome 6 with Intrauterine Growth Restriction.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xing Tianye, Hu Yanan, Yang Jing, Chang Deyou, Shang Xiaoling
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Uniparental disomy (UPD) is a well-known epigenomic anomaly characterized by the inheritance of both copies of a homologous pair of chromosomes (or part thereof) from the same parent. This genetic condition can have significant implications for prenatal diagnosis and management.
CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 29-year-old gravida 1 para 0 female who underwent amniocentesis at pregnancy Week 19 due to a high possibility of trisomy chromosome 6, as indicated by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed no abnormalities. Subsequently, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) detected uniparental disomy of chromosome 6. Additionally, an ultrasound examination at 28 weeks of gestation revealed intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Given these findings, the parents made the decision to terminate the pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of genetic counseling, FISH, karyotype analysis, WES, CMA, NIPT, and prenatal ultrasound can provide valuable insights for the prenatal diagnosis of UPD. These diagnostic approaches play a crucial role in identifying and managing cases of UPD, primarily when associated with intrauterine growth restrictions.
CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 29-year-old gravida 1 para 0 female who underwent amniocentesis at pregnancy Week 19 due to a high possibility of trisomy chromosome 6, as indicated by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed no abnormalities. Subsequently, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) detected uniparental disomy of chromosome 6. Additionally, an ultrasound examination at 28 weeks of gestation revealed intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Given these findings, the parents made the decision to terminate the pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of genetic counseling, FISH, karyotype analysis, WES, CMA, NIPT, and prenatal ultrasound can provide valuable insights for the prenatal diagnosis of UPD. These diagnostic approaches play a crucial role in identifying and managing cases of UPD, primarily when associated with intrauterine growth restrictions.