American journal of ophthalmology · 2005
Optic disk ovality as an index of tilt and its relationship to myopia and perimetry.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tay Eugene, Seah Steve K, Chan Siew-Pang, Lim Albert T H, Chew Sek-Jin, Foster Paul J, Aung Tin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the association of optic disk ovality with myopic refractive error, axial length, and the visual field.
DESIGN: Prospective observational case series.
METHODS: The study included 150 randomly recruited male subjects with myopia. In all cases, one eye was randomly selected, and subjective refraction, slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, funduscopy, and color optic disk stereo photography were performed. Disk ovality was assessed using the ratio of minimum to maximum disk diameter (index of tilt). A ratio of < or = 0.8 was considered as significant disk tilt. Visual fields were tested using static automated threshold perimetry with two methods of optical correction: trial lenses and contact lenses.
RESULTS: Of the total sample, 137 subjects completed the study. Mean age was 21.2 +/- 1.1 year, and mean spherical equivalent was -6.36 +/- 3.56 diopters. Mean ovality ratio was 0.83 +/- 0.09; 55 subjects (40.2%) had significant tilted optic disks. Greater optic disk ovality (tilt) correlated with greater myopia (P = .009) and longer axial length (P = .009); 95.6% of subjects had normal visual fields with both methods of optical correction. Using multiple linear regression analysis, greater tilt was independently related to a higher mean defect on testing with trial lenses (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased optic disk tilt was associated with higher myopia and reduced sensitivity on field testing. These factors are important in the assessment of glaucoma in patients with myopia.
DESIGN: Prospective observational case series.
METHODS: The study included 150 randomly recruited male subjects with myopia. In all cases, one eye was randomly selected, and subjective refraction, slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, funduscopy, and color optic disk stereo photography were performed. Disk ovality was assessed using the ratio of minimum to maximum disk diameter (index of tilt). A ratio of < or = 0.8 was considered as significant disk tilt. Visual fields were tested using static automated threshold perimetry with two methods of optical correction: trial lenses and contact lenses.
RESULTS: Of the total sample, 137 subjects completed the study. Mean age was 21.2 +/- 1.1 year, and mean spherical equivalent was -6.36 +/- 3.56 diopters. Mean ovality ratio was 0.83 +/- 0.09; 55 subjects (40.2%) had significant tilted optic disks. Greater optic disk ovality (tilt) correlated with greater myopia (P = .009) and longer axial length (P = .009); 95.6% of subjects had normal visual fields with both methods of optical correction. Using multiple linear regression analysis, greater tilt was independently related to a higher mean defect on testing with trial lenses (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased optic disk tilt was associated with higher myopia and reduced sensitivity on field testing. These factors are important in the assessment of glaucoma in patients with myopia.