Midazolam or propofol added to ketamine: Which combination is better for the reduction of shoulder dislocation in the emergency department?
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Glenohumeral dislocation is the most common type of shoulder dislocation and a leading cause of shoulder instability. Adequate muscle relaxation and pain control are essential for successful reduction. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of ketamine-midazolam (KM) versus ketamine-propofol (KP) for procedural sedation in anterior shoulder dislocations in the emergency department (ED). Effectiveness was evaluated using Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) scores, sedation onset, total procedure and recovery times, and reduction success. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events.
METHODS
This prospective, single-blind, randomized trial included patients ≥18 years presenting to a tertiary ED with anterior shoulder dislocation. Patients were randomized into two groups: KM (ketamine plus midazolam) and KP (ketamine plus propofol). Demographic and clinical characteristics, RSS scores, procedure and recovery times, adverse events, and additional sedation requirements were recorded.
RESULTS
Sixty-four patients were analyzed, 32 in each group. The overall mean RSS score was 4.5 ± 1.0, significantly higher in the KP group (P < 0.001). Adverse events were more common in the KM group, including higher rates of respiratory depression (P = 0.023) and tachycardia (P < 0.001). The mean procedure time was 5.7 ± 4.7 min, and recovery time was 36.3 ± 14.4 min, both significantly shorter in the KP group (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION
In the ED, the ketamine-propofol combination appears to be a safe and effective option for procedural sedation and analgesia, particularly in interventions such as shoulder reduction.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.