MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/sti.2009.040865

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted infections · 2010

Changes in the state-level distribution of primary and secondary syphilis in the USA, 1985-2007.

Chesson Harrell W, Sternberg Maya, Leichliter Jami S, Aral Sevgi O

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To examine changes over time in the distribution of primary and secondary syphilis cases across states, using Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients.

METHODS

For each year from 1985 to 2007, the Gini coefficient for the state-level distribution of male and female syphilis cases was calculated. The Gini coefficient can range from 0 (indicating equality in syphilis rates across states) to 1 (indicating complete inequality such that all syphilis cases occur in one state).

RESULTS

The Gini coefficients for men are notably lower (indicating more equality in the distribution of syphilis across states) in recent years (in which men who have sex with men (MSM) account for most syphilis cases) than in the heterosexual epidemic of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Although syphilis rates in men were similar in 1995 and 2007 (6.7 and 6.6 per 100,000, respectively), the Gini coefficient for male syphilis decreased from 0.523 in 1995 to 0.333 in 2007. For syphilis in women, Gini coefficients have not shown the same degree of decline.

CONCLUSIONS

The spread of MSM syphilis cases to urban areas across the nation is likely to be a main cause of the decreased concentration of male syphilis cases across states from 1995 to 2007.

Для цитирования: Chesson Harrell W, Sternberg Maya, Leichliter Jami S, Aral Sevgi O. Changes in the state-level distribution of primary and secondary syphilis in the USA, 1985-2007.. Sexually transmitted infections. 2010. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.040865.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.