Current medical imaging · 2026
Development and Validation of an MR Signal Intensity Ratio-based Discriminant Classification Model for Differentiating Nasopharyngeal Lymphoid Hyperplasia from Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Wen, Li Ying-Qi, Tong Ge-Hua, Qin Xue-Ling, Zou Xiao-Feng, Liang Wei, Liu Yi-Yong, Liang Jiu-Ping
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Early-stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) and Nasopharyngeal Lymphoid Hyperplasia (NPLH) share similar clinical and MRI features, complicating non-invasive diagnosis. As MRI accuracy decreases with diffuse NPC signals, objective differentiation methods are urgently needed. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficiency of an MRI Signal Intensity Ratio (SIR) based discriminant classification model in distinguishing NPLH from NPC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with pathologically confirmed nasopharyngeal lesions (27 with NPLH and 99 with NPC) were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum, minimum, and mean signal intensities of the lesions were measured on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI+C). Signal Intensity Ratios (SIRs) were calculated by normalizing lesion SI to that of the longus capitis muscle. A discriminant model was then developed to differentiate NPLH from NPC.
RESULTS: Stepwise discriminant analysis identified T2WI-Max-SIR and T1WI+C-Min-SIR as the optimal predictors. The established discriminant classification model yielded an original accuracy of 95.2% and a cross-validated accuracy of 93.7% in distinguishing NPLH from NPC.
DISCUSSION: NPC exhibited a significantly lower T2WI-SIR than NPLH. Incorporating these quantitative metrics into a discriminant model provides an objective assessment, minimizing scanner inconsistencies and overcoming the limitations of subjective visual evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Integrating T2WI-Max-SIR and T1WI+C-Min-SIR into a discriminant classification model enables accurate, objective, and non-invasive differentiation between NPLH and NPC, which potentially reduces unnecessary biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with pathologically confirmed nasopharyngeal lesions (27 with NPLH and 99 with NPC) were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum, minimum, and mean signal intensities of the lesions were measured on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI+C). Signal Intensity Ratios (SIRs) were calculated by normalizing lesion SI to that of the longus capitis muscle. A discriminant model was then developed to differentiate NPLH from NPC.
RESULTS: Stepwise discriminant analysis identified T2WI-Max-SIR and T1WI+C-Min-SIR as the optimal predictors. The established discriminant classification model yielded an original accuracy of 95.2% and a cross-validated accuracy of 93.7% in distinguishing NPLH from NPC.
DISCUSSION: NPC exhibited a significantly lower T2WI-SIR than NPLH. Incorporating these quantitative metrics into a discriminant model provides an objective assessment, minimizing scanner inconsistencies and overcoming the limitations of subjective visual evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Integrating T2WI-Max-SIR and T1WI+C-Min-SIR into a discriminant classification model enables accurate, objective, and non-invasive differentiation between NPLH and NPC, which potentially reduces unnecessary biopsies.