Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in postacute care units: a health record review.

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of vascular-related mortality. While VTE prophylaxis (VTEp) is well established in acute care settings, its value in postacute care units, such as transitional care units (TCUs) at our institution, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study therefore aimed to characterize current VTEp use in TCUs at a tertiary care hospital and to evaluate associated thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective electronic health record review of patients admitted to TCUs at The Ottawa Hospital between March 1, 2021, and March 1, 2022. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation for indications other than VTEp or with repeat TCU admissions were excluded. Data were collected with standardized forms and analyzed descriptively; logistic regression was used to explore associations between VTEp and thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

Among 1218 patients (mean age, 76 years; 56% female), 72% received VTEp during their TCU stay-primarily enoxaparin (85%) or unfractionated heparin (12%); 75% of these patients remained on prophylaxis for their entire TCU admission. VTEp recipients more often had recent surgery or active cancer, whereas patients in the non-VTEp group more commonly had dementia or previous gastrointestinal bleeding. The overall PE incidence and DVT incidence within 90 days were low (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively) and similar between the groups. Hemorrhagic complications, intracranial hemorrhage (0.4%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (0.9%) were likewise infrequent and comparable. Adjusted odds ratios for these outcomes included 1.0 with wide CIs.

CONCLUSION

VTEp was used frequently and was usually continued for the full TCU stay. The number of VTE and bleeding events were low, limiting the ability to determine the optimal risk-benefit balance of VTEp use in this population.