DOI 10.1080/10790268.2019.1585134
Duplex ultrasound surveillance for deep vein thrombosis after acute traumatic spinal cord injury at rehabilitation admission.
Аннотация
Context/objective: To determine the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected through routine duplex screening and factors associated with DVT in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients on admission to rehabilitation.
Design
Retrospective chart review of medical records.
Setting
Acute inpatient rehabilitation.
Participants
One hundred and eighty-nine individuals admitted to rehabilitation within 2 weeks of initial traumatic SCI who underwent routine surveillance with duplex scan for DVT.Interventions: Duplex scan of lower extremities.Outcome measures: The dependent variable was positive duplex screening for either any DVT (distal and/or proximal) or proximal DVT.
Results
Of the 189 patients, 31 patients (16.4%) had a positive scan for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT, with 9 (4.8%) positive for a proximal DVT and 22 (11.6%) positive for isolated distal DVT. Of those with isolated distal DVT, 31.8% later developed propagation with either proximal DVTs or pulmonary embolism (mean = 22 days). Factors significantly associated with positive duplex scans for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT include more severe neurological injury (AIS A, B or C versus AIS D: χ2 = 7.1791, df = 1, P = 0.007) and older age (age ≥50 years old: χ2 = 14.9410, df = 1, P = 0.000).
Conclusion
In acute traumatic SCI, older age and more severe neurological impairment (AIS A, B, and C) are independent risk factors for positive duplex screening for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT detected on rehabilitation admission. Individuals with an acute distal DVT have a high likelihood for future thrombus progression. Routine surveillance for these patients may be warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.