MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.025

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2017

A systematic review and quantitative analysis of different therapies for pancreas divisum.

Hafezi Mohammadreza, Mayschak Bartosch, Probst Pascal, Büchler Markus W, Hackert Thilo, Mehrabi Arianeb

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pancreas divisum is the most common anatomical variation of pancreatic ductal system affecting 5-10% of population. Therapy includes different endoscopic and surgical procedures. The aim of this article was to summarize actual evidence of different treatment.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed to identify all studies, investigating endoscopic or surgical therapy of Pancreas divisum. An individual data simulation model was applied to compare endoscopic and surgical studies.

RESULT: 56 observational studies (31 endoscopic and 25 surgical studies) were included in analyses. Surgery was significantly superior to endoscopic treatment in terms of success rate (72% vs. 62.3), complication rate (23.8% vs. 31.3%) and re-intervention rate (14.4% vs. 28.3%).

CONCLUSION

Surgery may be superior to endoscopy in terms of treatment success and complications. There is no study comparing these two therapies. Consequently, a randomized trial is needed to clarify if endoscopy or surgery is superior in the therapy of pancreas divisum.

Для цитирования: Hafezi Mohammadreza, Mayschak Bartosch, Probst Pascal, Büchler Markus W, Hackert Thilo, Mehrabi Arianeb. A systematic review and quantitative analysis of different therapies for pancreas divisum.. American journal of surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.