MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060

Медицинская библиотека · BJS open · 2023

Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis.

Frassini Simone, Calabretto Francesca, Granieri Stefano, Fugazzola Paola, Massaro Matteo, Sargenti Benedetta, Schiavone Luca, Zanghì Simone, Dal Mas Francesca, Ansaloni Luca, Cobianchi Lorenzo

Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the prophylactic mesh augmentation technique.

METHODS

The Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened without time restrictions up to 21 June 2022 using the keywords 'laparotomy closure', 'mesh', 'mesh positioning', and 'prophylactic mesh', and including medical subject headings terms. Only RCTs reporting the incidence of incisional hernia and other wound complications after elective or emergency midline laparotomy, where patients were treated with prophylactic mesh augmentation or without mesh positioning, were included. The primary endpoint was to explore the risk of incisional hernia at different follow-up time points. The secondary endpoint was the risk of wound complications. The risk of bias for individual studies was assessed according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized trials.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs, including 2659 patients, were retrieved. A reduction in the risk of incisional hernia at every time point was highlighted in the prophylactic mesh augmentation group (1 year, risk ratio 0.31, P = 0.0011; 2 years, risk ratio 0.44, P < 0.0001; 3 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0026; 4 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0257). An increased risk of wound complications was highlighted for patients undergoing mesh augmentation, although this was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Midline laparotomy closure with prophylactic mesh augmentation can be considered safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Further trials are needed to identify the ideal type of mesh and technique for mesh positioning, but surgeons should consider prophylactic mesh augmentation to decrease incisional hernia rate, especially in high-risk patients for fascial dehiscence and even in emergency settings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD42022336242 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_email.php).

Для цитирования: Frassini Simone, Calabretto Francesca, Granieri Stefano, Fugazzola Paola, Massaro Matteo, Sargenti Benedetta, Schiavone Luca, Zanghì Simone, Dal Mas Francesca, Ansaloni Luca, Cobianchi Lorenzo. Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis.. BJS open. 2023. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.