MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.021

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2017

Eagle syndrome: A comprehensive review.

Badhey Arvind, Jategaonkar Ameya, Anglin Kovacs Alexander Joseph, Kadakia Sameep, De Deyn Peter Paul, Ducic Yadranko, Schantz Stimson, Shin Edward

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objective of this report is to summarize the symptoms, diagnostic workup, necessary imaging, and management of Eagle syndrome. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on peer-reviewed publications of Eagle syndrome across multiple disciplines in order to gain a thorough understanding of the presentation, diagnosis, and management of this disorder. Diagnoses of Eagle Syndrome have increased, in part due to the awareness of physicians to patient symptomatology. While cervical pain and dysphagia are among the typical symptoms, patients can present with a wide spectrum of benign and dangerous symptoms. CT scan is the gold standard for diagnosis and can be aided by both 3D reconstructive imaging and Angiography. Treatment strategies include medical management (analgesics, corticosteroids, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants) and varied surgical approaches (extraoral, transoral, endoscopic assisted). Increased understanding by providers treating patients with Eagle Syndrome allows for a more comprehensive treatment plan. With a variety of medical regimens and more definitive surgical approaches, Eagle Syndrome can be treated safely and effectively.

Для цитирования: Badhey Arvind, Jategaonkar Ameya, Anglin Kovacs Alexander Joseph, Kadakia Sameep, De Deyn Peter Paul, Ducic Yadranko, Schantz Stimson, Shin Edward. Eagle syndrome: A comprehensive review.. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.