DOI 10.1016/j.math.2014.12.001
Identifying upper limb disability in patients with persistent whiplash.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Patients with persistent whiplash associated disorders (WAD) report upper limb (UL) symptoms and functional difficulties but there is limited information regarding the nature of these complaints. Impairments in motor performance may relate to functional deficits.
OBJECTIVE
To identify symptoms and the degree and nature of UL functional difficulties.
DESIGN
Cross sectional study.
METHODS
Twenty-four age matched subjects with persistent WAD and healthy controls were surveyed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). A series of case studies on six subjects with persistent WAD and thirteen age and gender matched controls also had their motor performance assessed using a specialised UL testing battery, including reaction time, movement speed, accuracy, co-ordination and tapping speed.
RESULTS
The results suggest that UL symptoms and functional deficits are prevalent in persistent WAD. All individual item scores on the DASH, except one, were significantly higher in the WAD group and the DASH moderately correlated to pain, NDI and PSFS. Four-choice reaction time was the only motor performance measure that was significantly impaired in the WAD compared to control group and this correlated to pain levels.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest the DASH is a suitable measure for subjects with persistent WAD and could be administered when high NDI scores are present or the patient specifically reports difficulty with UL activities. Further investigation regarding UL motor performance in subjects with persistent WAD is warranted to determine relationships between symptoms and reported functional deficits.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.