MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s43046-020-00051-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2020

Primary urethral small cell melanoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report.

Nakra Tripti, Dadhwal Rohit, Nayyar Rishi, Rastogi Sameer, Kakkar Aanchal, Sharma Mehar Chand, Yadav Rajni

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Primary malignant melanoma of the female urethra is an exceedingly rare tumor. It represents 0.2% of all malignant melanomas. Divergent differentiation towards non-melanocytic lineages has not been reported in urethral melanoma.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report a rare case of neuroendocrine differentiation in a large primary small cell malignant melanoma involving the urethra, in a 62-year-old lady, who presented with obstructive urinary symptoms. Clinical and radiological workup revealed a large urethral mass with liver and lymph nodal metastases. A biopsy was performed from the urethral and liver lesions which showed poorly differentiated tumor cells with small cell morphology and presence of melanin pigment. These cells were immunopositive for melanocytic and neuroendocrine markers. Ultrastructural examination showed presence of melanosomes and neurosecretory granules in the tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Although malignant melanoma with neuroendocrine differentiation is exceptionally rare, it needs to be recognized among the other well-known variants of malignant melanoma.

Для цитирования: Nakra Tripti, Dadhwal Rohit, Nayyar Rishi, Rastogi Sameer, Kakkar Aanchal, Sharma Mehar Chand, Yadav Rajni. Primary urethral small cell melanoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report.. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s43046-020-00051-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.