Symptoms and clinical outcomes of gastric electrical stimulation in treatment-resistant gastroparesis: a systematic review across short- and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction, significantly impacting patient quality of life. Management of refractory gastroparesis remains challenging, with both gastric electrical stimulation (GES) and prokinetic medications used as treatment options. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence on GES clinical outcomes, the role of continued prokinetic therapy after GES, and indirect comparative data relevant to symptom management in adult patients with refractory gastroparesis.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2011 focusing on GES for gastroparesis. This window was selected to capture the period from initial FDA Humanitarian Device Exemption approval of the Enterra system (2000) through publication of cohorts with mature, multi-year follow-up (up to 10 years), maximizing the durability evidence available for analysis. Inclusion criteria required adult patients with refractory gastroparesis, GES as primary intervention, symptom-related outcomes, and minimum 6-week follow-up. Eight studies met eligibility criteria with follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 10 years. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for controlled trials.

RESULTS

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) demonstrated significant symptom improvement in patients with treatment-resistant gastroparesis. Controlled studies showed vomiting frequency reduction of 57% at 6 weeks, improving to 67.8% after one year (p < 0.001). Long-term data revealed ≥ 50% reduction in Total Symptom Scores in 58% of diabetic gastroparesis patients, 53% of post-surgical cases, and 48% of idiopathic gastroparesis patients (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3; Table 2). Combination therapy (GES plus prokinetics) yielded significantly better symptom scores (1.35) compared to GES alone (2.20, p = 0.02). Device-related infection requiring removal occurred in approximately 7% of cases. No direct head-to-head comparisons between GES and prokinetic medications alone were identified.

CONCLUSION

GES provides substantial symptom relief for treatment-resistant gastroparesis, particularly in diabetic gastroparesis. Combination therapy with GES plus prokinetics appears superior to GES monotherapy. However, the absence of direct comparative studies limits definitive conclusions regarding relative effectiveness versus prokinetic medications alone. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols and patient selection criteria along with the role of other surgical approaches. Planned next steps include direct comparisons of GES with pyloric-directed interventions - namely gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) and surgical pyloroplasty - to clarify the optimal positioning of GES within the contemporary treatment algorithm for refractory gastroparesis.