Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2026
Risk of magnetic sphincter augmentation erosion following sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Noel Patrick, Jacobs Moises
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) affects up to 40% of patients. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but device erosion remains a critical concern in postbariatric populations.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MSA erosion rates after LSG and compare them with general populations, while identifying risk factors and clinical outcomes.
SETTING: Multi-institutional systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through September 2025. Primary outcome was device erosion rate. Secondary outcomes included time to erosion, risk factors, clinical presentation, and management. Random-effects meta-analysis with heterogeneity assessment was performed.
RESULTS: Analysis of 14 studies encompassing 287 patients with median follow-up of 24 months revealed overall erosion rate of 3.8% (11/287), significantly higher than .1%-.3% in nonbariatric populations (P < .001). Median time to erosion was 18 months. Factors associated with erosion included body mass index > 30 kg/m2 at MSA (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2), absence of hiatal repair (OR: 4.1), device undersizing (OR: 3.8), and persistent sleeve dilatation (OR: 2.7). Most erosions (72.7%) presented with dysphagia; all required explantation with 90.9% symptom resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: MSA erosion risk after LSG is elevated compared to nonbariatric populations but remains below 4% with proper patient selection, and must be weighed against the 7%-8% complication rate of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion. Based on very low to low-certainty evidence, body mass index optimization, adequate hiatal repair, appropriate device sizing, and sleeve evaluation may help minimize erosion risk in this population, although these recommendations require prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MSA erosion rates after LSG and compare them with general populations, while identifying risk factors and clinical outcomes.
SETTING: Multi-institutional systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through September 2025. Primary outcome was device erosion rate. Secondary outcomes included time to erosion, risk factors, clinical presentation, and management. Random-effects meta-analysis with heterogeneity assessment was performed.
RESULTS: Analysis of 14 studies encompassing 287 patients with median follow-up of 24 months revealed overall erosion rate of 3.8% (11/287), significantly higher than .1%-.3% in nonbariatric populations (P < .001). Median time to erosion was 18 months. Factors associated with erosion included body mass index > 30 kg/m2 at MSA (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2), absence of hiatal repair (OR: 4.1), device undersizing (OR: 3.8), and persistent sleeve dilatation (OR: 2.7). Most erosions (72.7%) presented with dysphagia; all required explantation with 90.9% symptom resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: MSA erosion risk after LSG is elevated compared to nonbariatric populations but remains below 4% with proper patient selection, and must be weighed against the 7%-8% complication rate of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion. Based on very low to low-certainty evidence, body mass index optimization, adequate hiatal repair, appropriate device sizing, and sleeve evaluation may help minimize erosion risk in this population, although these recommendations require prospective validation.