MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037//0278-7393.13.3.464

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 1987

A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia.

Shimamura A P, Squire L R

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We investigated the ability of amnesic patients to learn new facts (e.g., Angel Falls is located in Venezuela) and also to remember where and when the facts were learned (i.e., source memory). To assess the susceptibility of fact and source memory to retrograde amnesia, patients prescribed electroconvulsive therapy were presented facts prior to the first treatment and were tested after their second treatment. All amnesic patients exhibited marked fact memory impairment. In addition, some amnesic patients exhibited source amnesia (i.e., they recalled a few facts but then could not remember where or when those facts had been learned). Source amnesia was unrelated to the severity of the memory deficit itself, because patients who exhibited source amnesia recalled as many facts as the patients who did not. These results show that the deficit in amnesia includes an impairment in acquiring and retaining new facts. Source amnesia can also occur, but it is dissociable from impaired recall and recognition and appears to reflect difficulty in remembering the specific context in which information is acquired. The findings are discussed in terms of their significance for how memory is organized.

Для цитирования: Shimamura A P, Squire L R. A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia.. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition. 1987. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.3.464.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.