DOI 10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.501988
i-PCNL: a novel ureteral-catheter application for continuous unidirectional high-flow irrigation during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Technique description and preliminary outcomes.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the technique of choice for the treatment of complex renal stones. Despite technical advances, limitations remain in terms of visibility, fragment migration, and effective evacuation of the material. Optimizing irrigation is the key to improve the efficiency and safety of the procedure.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A prospective observational study was done at one referral center, including 14 patients undergoing supine PCNL. A continuous retrograde irrigation technique directed at the upper renal pole was evaluated by adapting commercially available ureteral devices of a specific caliber. Irrigation was performed using a passive system based on hydrostatic pressure dependent on the height of the irrigation bags. Demographic variables, stone characteristics, operative and postoperative parameters, complications, stone-free rate (SFR), and a subjective evaluation of the system using a Likert scale were analyzed.
RESULTS
The technique was performed in all cases without incident. No migration of fragments to the upper pole was observed. The mean effective lithotripsy time was 10.07 min. No relevant complications were recorded, except for one case of postoperative anemia. The SFR was 100% in the tomographic control at 4 weeks. The subjective assessment showed high scores for irrigation efficacy, vision quality, and fragment evacuation.
CONCLUSIONS
Continuous retrograde irrigation during PCNL is a simple and reproducible technique that, in this preliminary series, showed favorable results, making it a promising option.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.