MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1078/1438-4639-00174

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2002

Cardiovascular effects of carbon disulfide: meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Tan Xiaodong, Peng Xiaoxia, Wang Fuyuan, Joyeux Michel, Hartemann Philippe

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objectives were to review the evidence of cardiovascular effects of carbon disulfide (CS2) on exposed workers from different cohort studies. Databases searched included MEDLINE, TOXLINE, and OSHtM Database (CD-ROM). Reference lists of reports and reviews were also searched. To be included in the analysis, a study had to have been a cohort study on cardiovascular effects of carbon disulfide with at least one outcome of interest. Every report was independently read using the Lichtenstein scale, General information of each study and relative risk estimates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using the fixed-effects model. Pooled relative risks were calculated by the Dersimonian-Laird method basing on the random-effects model. Eleven cohort studies were identified in an extensive literature review. Pooled RR value was 1.56 and its 95% confidence interval was from 1.12 to 2.1, which showed CS2 exposure has feeble correlation with the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. It is proved that meta-analysis is a sensitive method for combining different results in occupational epidemiology.

Для цитирования: Tan Xiaodong, Peng Xiaoxia, Wang Fuyuan, Joyeux Michel, Hartemann Philippe. Cardiovascular effects of carbon disulfide: meta-analysis of cohort studies.. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2002. DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00174.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.