MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112411

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2026

Artificial Intelligence-enabled GRADE: how the GRADE Working Group will use automation to rate the certainty of evidence of intervention effects.

Sousa-Pinto Bernardo, Marques-Cruz Manuel, Vieira Rafael José, Duarte Vítor Henrique, Ávila-Oliver Camila, Dobrescu Andreea, Jemioło Paweł, Agarwal Arnav, Bala Malgorzata M, Beltran Jessica, Bognanni Antonio, Cruciani Fabio, Dewidar Omar, Gil-Mata Sara, Liang Changhao, Martinho-Dias Daniel, Nowak Claus, Ocagli Honoria, Perestrelo Paula, Pereira Nunes Pinto Ana Carolina, Reis-Pardal Joana, Riera-Serra Pau, Rocha Aline, Fernández-Saénz Karina, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta Itziar, Harrod Curtis S, Langendam Miranda W, Meerpohl Joerg, Nonino Francesco, Wiercioch Wojtek, Neumann Ignacio, Izcovich Ariel, Minozzi Silvia, Gartlehner Gerald, Schünemann Holger J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group is developing GRADErater (GRADE Rating Automation Through Enhanced Reasoning), an official, automated tool for evaluation of the certainty of evidence (CoE). In this article, we describe the principles and methods underlying its development and state how the GRADE Working Group (GWG) will use automation to rate the CoE of intervention effects.

METHODS

We followed the GRADE methods for registering a project group on GRADE and artificial intelligence (AI). The project group established that the automated tool should be developed according to the following principles: (i) compliance with the current GRADE guidance, (ii) transparency, (iii) human oversight, (iv) implementation of decision rules, (v) ease of use, (vi) understandability, and (vii) continuous improvement. We developed a set of decision rules to appraise each domain of the CoE in pairwise and network meta-analysis. These rules were developed based on official GRADE sources and validated by GRADE experts. Based on these rules, we created a first version (https://gradeai.med.up.pt/) for GRADErater. We are now evaluating this version in terms of (i) its underlying rules and (ii) its user interface. These assessments will allow for a refinement of the rules and of the first version. The modified version will be appraised and presented to the GWG with input from internal and external interest-holders before we seek formal approval. Once launched, the automated tool will be continuously evaluated and refined by incorporating feedback from end users. We will add new features (including generative AI-based functionalities), integrate this tool with GRADEpro, and develop versions in languages other than English.

CONCLUSION

This project will follow a transparent methodology to create GRADErater, an official tool endorsed by the GWG that will support humans in applying the most current GRADE methods to rate the CoE.

Для цитирования: Sousa-Pinto Bernardo, Marques-Cruz Manuel, Vieira Rafael José, Duarte Vítor Henrique, Ávila-Oliver Camila, Dobrescu Andreea, Jemioło Paweł, Agarwal Arnav, Bala Malgorzata M, Beltran Jessica, Bognanni Antonio, Cruciani Fabio, Dewidar Omar, Gil-Mata Sara, Liang Changhao, Martinho-Dias Daniel, Nowak Claus, Ocagli Honoria, Perestrelo Paula, Pereira Nunes Pinto Ana Carolina, Reis-Pardal Joana, Riera-Serra Pau, Rocha Aline, Fernández-Saénz Karina, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta Itziar, Harrod Curtis S, Langendam Miranda W, Meerpohl Joerg, Nonino Francesco, Wiercioch Wojtek, Neumann Ignacio, Izcovich Ariel, Minozzi Silvia, Gartlehner Gerald, Schünemann Holger J. Artificial Intelligence-enabled GRADE: how the GRADE Working Group will use automation to rate the certainty of evidence of intervention effects.. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112411.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.