Communications medicine · 2026
Quantifying cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis MRI datasets using multi-contrast post-processing and deep learning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dwyer Michael G, Bergsland Niels, Bartnik Alexander, Jakimovski Dejan, Noteboom Samantha, Schoonheim Menno M, Steenwijk Martijn D, Pei Jinglan, Clayton David, Zivadinov Robert
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease affecting both white and gray matter of the central nervous system. Despite the well-established involvement of cortical lesions in MS, feasibility limitations in their visualization on typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols prevent their evaluation in nearly all clinical trials. Recently, several post-processing methods, including synthetic contrasts and artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches, have shown potential for enhancing cortical lesion detection on conventional MRI data. These methods have the potential to reanalyze existing clinical-trial data to answer key mechanistic questions about both MS development and about treatment effects.
METHODS: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of combining and extending existing methods into a unified framework for analysis using the data from the large, multicenter, phase 3 ORATORIO trial (full n = 732, age=44.6 ± 8.0; development subset n = 80, age=46.6 ± 7.1). We specifically evaluated three of the most promising of them - fluid-attenuated inversion recovery squared (FLAIR2), T1/T2 ratio, and artificial intelligence-derived double inversion recovery (AI-DIR) - and introduced a new combined contrast called multi-modal cortical lesion enhanced (MMCLE). We also harnessed transformer-based semantic segmentation to improve automated detection and delineation of these lesions.
RESULTS: At baseline, we detected 14.8 + /-20.72 lesions per participant, with 86.0% true positive rate and 8.4% false positive rate across subjects for blinded MMCLE, using simultaneous review of all contrasts as the reference. High reproducibility was observed across field strengths and acquisition types (ICC 88.8-92.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that cortical lesions can be clearly visualized and quantified with these methods. Using deep learning, we also confirmed that the simultaneous use of multiple contrasts improves quantification.
METHODS: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of combining and extending existing methods into a unified framework for analysis using the data from the large, multicenter, phase 3 ORATORIO trial (full n = 732, age=44.6 ± 8.0; development subset n = 80, age=46.6 ± 7.1). We specifically evaluated three of the most promising of them - fluid-attenuated inversion recovery squared (FLAIR2), T1/T2 ratio, and artificial intelligence-derived double inversion recovery (AI-DIR) - and introduced a new combined contrast called multi-modal cortical lesion enhanced (MMCLE). We also harnessed transformer-based semantic segmentation to improve automated detection and delineation of these lesions.
RESULTS: At baseline, we detected 14.8 + /-20.72 lesions per participant, with 86.0% true positive rate and 8.4% false positive rate across subjects for blinded MMCLE, using simultaneous review of all contrasts as the reference. High reproducibility was observed across field strengths and acquisition types (ICC 88.8-92.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that cortical lesions can be clearly visualized and quantified with these methods. Using deep learning, we also confirmed that the simultaneous use of multiple contrasts improves quantification.