MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.018

Медицинская библиотека · Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2017

Is Achillon repair safe and reliable in delayed presentation Achilles tendon rupture? A five-year follow-up.

Anathallee M Yasser, Liu Ben, Budgen Adam, Stanley James

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To assess the outcome of delayed repair of ruptured Achilles tendon using the Achillon mini-open technique.

METHODS

A review of all patients who underwent delayed repair (>10 days post injury) of ruptured Achilles tendon with mini invasive technique was compared to acute repairs carried out at the same unit. Leppilahti Score and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) were utilised. Complication rates including re-rupture were also reviewed.

RESULTS

14 patients were identified as having delayed repair (11-31 days). The mean follow-up period was 71 months (range: 58-92). There were no statistically significant difference in the Leppilahti Score and ATRS compared to patients treated acutely (<10 days post injury) in the same time period. 79% of patients with delayed repair reported good to excellent, comparable to 80% of patients having undergone acute repair.

CONCLUSIONS

For those patients who would benefit from surgical repair, a mini-open technique using the Achillon suture-passing device remains a safe and reliable option for delayed presentation of 11-31 days.

Для цитирования: Anathallee M Yasser, Liu Ben, Budgen Adam, Stanley James. Is Achillon repair safe and reliable in delayed presentation Achilles tendon rupture? A five-year follow-up.. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.