Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2020
Changes in medial elbow elasticity and joint space gapping during maximal gripping: reliability and validity in evaluation of the medial elbow joint using ultrasound elastography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hattori Hiroshi, Akasaka Kiyokazu, Otsudo Takahiro, Hall Toby, Amemiya Katsuya, Mori Yoshihisa, Sakaguchi Katsunobu, Tachibana Yomei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Medial elbow injuries are common in baseball pitchers. This study investigated the reliability of medial elbow elastography measurement and the characteristics of the medial elbow stabilizers.
METHODS: Medial elbow joint space gapping and the strain ratios of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and the forearm flexor-pronator muscle (FPM) were measured at rest and during gripping in 29 healthy college students. The intraclass correlation coefficients of elastography were calculated. The data were compared between tissues and between rest and gripping.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1,3) of the elastography measurements were 0.91 and 0.83 for the UCL and 0.80 and 0.85 for the FPM for each examiner. Medial elbow joint space gapping during gripping (3.1 ± 0.6 mm) was significantly less than that at rest (3.8 ± 0.8 mm, P < .001). The strain ratios for both the UCL and FPM during gripping were significantly greater than those at rest (17.64 ± 10.97 during gripping vs. 3.94 ± 1.92 at rest for UCL, P < .001; 1.72 ± 0.99 during gripping vs. 0.35 ± 1.92 at rest for FPM, P < .001). The strain ratio for the UCL was significantly greater than that for the FPM both at rest (P < .001) and during gripping (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Elastography measurements of the UCL and FPM have almost perfect reliability. Gripping reduces medial elbow joint space gapping compared with rest. For both tissues, gripping reduces their elasticity compared with rest. The elasticity of the UCL is less than that of the FPM both at rest and during gripping.
METHODS: Medial elbow joint space gapping and the strain ratios of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and the forearm flexor-pronator muscle (FPM) were measured at rest and during gripping in 29 healthy college students. The intraclass correlation coefficients of elastography were calculated. The data were compared between tissues and between rest and gripping.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1,3) of the elastography measurements were 0.91 and 0.83 for the UCL and 0.80 and 0.85 for the FPM for each examiner. Medial elbow joint space gapping during gripping (3.1 ± 0.6 mm) was significantly less than that at rest (3.8 ± 0.8 mm, P < .001). The strain ratios for both the UCL and FPM during gripping were significantly greater than those at rest (17.64 ± 10.97 during gripping vs. 3.94 ± 1.92 at rest for UCL, P < .001; 1.72 ± 0.99 during gripping vs. 0.35 ± 1.92 at rest for FPM, P < .001). The strain ratio for the UCL was significantly greater than that for the FPM both at rest (P < .001) and during gripping (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Elastography measurements of the UCL and FPM have almost perfect reliability. Gripping reduces medial elbow joint space gapping compared with rest. For both tissues, gripping reduces their elasticity compared with rest. The elasticity of the UCL is less than that of the FPM both at rest and during gripping.