Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026
Impact of Prophylactic Cefepime on Surgical Site Infection and Severe Morbidity in Patients Who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Preoperative Biliary Drainage.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watanabe Genki, Murata Akihiro, Kasamatsu Yu, Ishihara Atsushi, Nagashima Daisuke, Tashima Tetsuzo, Kodai Shintaro, Kanazawa Akishige, Shimizu Sadatoshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics can reduce postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the optimal regimen remains uncertain. This study evaluated the impact of prophylactic cefepime (CFPM) on surgical site infection (SSI) and severe morbidity after PD with preoperative biliary drainage.
METHODS: Among 352 patients who underwent PD from 2010 to 2023, 163 patients met the inclusion criteria. Cefmetazole (CMZ) or cefazolin (CEZ) were administered as prophylactic antibiotics before May 2016, and CFPM thereafter. Short-term outcomes were compared between patients receiving CMZ/CEZ and those receiving CFPM. Risk factors for SSI and severe morbidity were assessed by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The CFPM group (n = 100) had more neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a higher rate of metallic stent placement, and a longer interval between initial biliary drainage and surgery, but less portal vein resection, lower blood loss, and fewer transfusions than the CMZ/CEZ group. Rates of superficial/deep incisional SSI and organ/space SSI were markedly lower with CFPM (3.0% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001; and 10.0% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.001, respectively), which were associated with a reduction in Enterobacter cloacae infection. Severe morbidity was also reduced in the CFPM group (18.0% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.002). Use of CMZ/CEZ was independently associated with increased SSI and severe morbidity (OR = 10.6, p < 0.001; and OR = 3.53, p = 0.001). Emergence of resistant organisms did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CFPM may reduce SSIs and severe morbidity after PD with preoperative biliary drainage.
METHODS: Among 352 patients who underwent PD from 2010 to 2023, 163 patients met the inclusion criteria. Cefmetazole (CMZ) or cefazolin (CEZ) were administered as prophylactic antibiotics before May 2016, and CFPM thereafter. Short-term outcomes were compared between patients receiving CMZ/CEZ and those receiving CFPM. Risk factors for SSI and severe morbidity were assessed by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The CFPM group (n = 100) had more neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a higher rate of metallic stent placement, and a longer interval between initial biliary drainage and surgery, but less portal vein resection, lower blood loss, and fewer transfusions than the CMZ/CEZ group. Rates of superficial/deep incisional SSI and organ/space SSI were markedly lower with CFPM (3.0% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001; and 10.0% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.001, respectively), which were associated with a reduction in Enterobacter cloacae infection. Severe morbidity was also reduced in the CFPM group (18.0% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.002). Use of CMZ/CEZ was independently associated with increased SSI and severe morbidity (OR = 10.6, p < 0.001; and OR = 3.53, p = 0.001). Emergence of resistant organisms did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CFPM may reduce SSIs and severe morbidity after PD with preoperative biliary drainage.