MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.109454

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2026

Clinical Effects and Feasibility of Virtual Reality Table Tennis in People With Parkinson's Disease in a Supervised Outpatient Setting: A Case Series.

Fujioka Shinsuke, Nagaki Koichi, Takami Junichi, Kimura Kazuki, Yamaguchi Yoshiki, Kitano Kosuke, Kikuchi Hitoshi, Tsuboi Yoshio

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In Parkinson's disease, conventional rehabilitation has long been a cornerstone of symptom management; however, in recent years, an increasing number of studies have reported the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation. Although a variety of VR modalities have been explored, there have been no prior reports specifically investigating rehabilitation using table tennis-based VR software. We report a case series evaluating VR table tennis as rehabilitation in 4 patients with Parkinson's disease (Hoehn-Yahr stages II-III). Participants completed 16 sessions of VR training. Motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and usability were assessed using the MDS-UPDRS, PDQ-39, and System Usability Scale. Improvements exceeding the minimal clinically important difference were observed in motor function and QOL. All participants completed the program without encountering any adverse events. Our findings suggest that VR table tennis is a safe and feasible rehabilitation method for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Для цитирования: Fujioka Shinsuke, Nagaki Koichi, Takami Junichi, Kimura Kazuki, Yamaguchi Yoshiki, Kitano Kosuke, Kikuchi Hitoshi, Tsuboi Yoshio. Clinical Effects and Feasibility of Virtual Reality Table Tennis in People With Parkinson's Disease in a Supervised Outpatient Setting: A Case Series.. Cureus. 2026. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.109454.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.