MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/20961790.2017.1287155

Медицинская библиотека · Forensic sciences research · 2017

Violent offences of methamphetamine users and dilemmas of forensic psychiatric assessment.

Liu Yi, Hao Bo, Shi Yanwei, Xue Li, Wang Xiaoguang, Chen Yefei, Zhao Hu

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Methamphetamine (MA), an extremely addictive synthetic stimulant, has quickly spread to become the most frequently used illicit drug in China. People with a history of chronic and heavy MA use have a high possibility of exhibiting schizophrenia-like psychotic symptoms, mainly delusions of reference, auditory hallucinations and cognitive deficits. These emerging findings suggest MA use increases aggression and violence and that there is a correlation between MA use and violence. However, it is unclear how to assess the capacity of criminal responsibility in "MA-induced" psychosis and how to set clear boundaries between schizophrenia and MA-induced psychosis when only limited and inconsistent evidence is available. Furthermore, a final persuasive differential diagnostic method based on improved understanding of schizophrenia and MA-induced psychotic disorders has yet to be developed. This paper will evaluate the epidemiology, social harm, and forensic psychiatric assessment of MA users, propose a future direction for the differential diagnosis between MA-induced psychotic disorders and schizophrenia, and put forward some practical solutions to assess the capacity of criminal responsibility of defendants with drug-induced psychotic disorder.

Для цитирования: Liu Yi, Hao Bo, Shi Yanwei, Xue Li, Wang Xiaoguang, Chen Yefei, Zhao Hu. Violent offences of methamphetamine users and dilemmas of forensic psychiatric assessment.. Forensic sciences research. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1287155.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.