MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.07.020

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of medicine · 2024

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure.

Kim Jihoon, Kang Danbee, Park Hyejeong, Park Taek Kyu, Lee Joo Myung, Yang Jeong Hoon, Song Young Bin, Choi Jin-Ho, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol, Guallar Eliseo, Cho Juhee, Hahn Joo-Yong

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can be an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between initial ARB and ACEI therapy in patients with MI without HF.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 31,013 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for MI with prescription of ARBs or ACEIs at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Patients who had HF at index MI were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes included recurrent MI, hospitalization for new heart HF, stroke, and a composite of each outcome.

RESULTS

Of 31,013 patients, ARBs were prescribed in 12,685 (40.9%) and ACEIs in 18,328 (59.1%). Patients receiving ARBs had a lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving ACEIs (28.2% vs 43.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.37; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 2480 patients died. The incidence rate of all-cause death in patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs was 27.7 and 22.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13; P = .40). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs, except stroke (19.2 vs 13.6 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, a higher mortality was observed with ARBs compared with ACEIs in patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between ARBs and ACEIs as discharge medications in patients with myocardial infarction without heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers would be an alternative to ACEIs for those intolerant to ACEI therapy.

Для цитирования: Kim Jihoon, Kang Danbee, Park Hyejeong, Park Taek Kyu, Lee Joo Myung, Yang Jeong Hoon, Song Young Bin, Choi Jin-Ho, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol, Guallar Eliseo, Cho Juhee, Hahn Joo-Yong. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure.. The American journal of medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.07.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.