Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2015
Single-centred experience with levosimendan in paediatric decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Séguéla Pierre-Emmanuel, Mauriat Philippe, Mouton Jean-Baptiste, Tafer Nadir, Assy Jana, Poncelet Géraldine, Nubret Karine, Iriart Xavier, Thambo Jean-Benoit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Children with dilated cardiomyopathy in advanced heart failure may spend a long time awaiting heart transplantation. Consequently, mechanical circulatory support is sometimes required as a bridge to transplantation. Levosimendan, a positive inotropic agent, has been reported to be safe and efficient for the treatment of paediatric heart failure.
AIMS: To report our experience with levosimendan in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: Paediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy on the transplant waiting list and with criteria for mechanical support were included in this single-centred retrospective study. Each patient received at least one 24-hour infusion of levosimendan before mechanical circulatory support was considered. Biological and echocardiographic data were analysed.
RESULTS: Six patients were included over a 24-month period. The median age was 25.5months (7.7-34.2months); 82 infusions were performed. Median B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased significantly between days 0 and 2 (2443ng/L [1458-3819ng/L] vs 1358ng/L [1025-2534ng/L]; P=0.003). While only a trend was noted in left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (P=0.054 by Simpson's method and P=0.068 by the Teicholz method), the subaortic velocity time integral rose significantly between days 0 and 8 (12.8cm/s [10-14.5cm/s] vs 15.3cm/s [14.3-16.9cm/s]; P=0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan seems to improve haemodynamics in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy; repeated infusions may delay the need for mechanical circulatory support while awaiting heart transplantation. This therapeutic agent should be systematically considered in this setting, in addition to conventional inotropic drugs.
AIMS: To report our experience with levosimendan in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: Paediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy on the transplant waiting list and with criteria for mechanical support were included in this single-centred retrospective study. Each patient received at least one 24-hour infusion of levosimendan before mechanical circulatory support was considered. Biological and echocardiographic data were analysed.
RESULTS: Six patients were included over a 24-month period. The median age was 25.5months (7.7-34.2months); 82 infusions were performed. Median B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased significantly between days 0 and 2 (2443ng/L [1458-3819ng/L] vs 1358ng/L [1025-2534ng/L]; P=0.003). While only a trend was noted in left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (P=0.054 by Simpson's method and P=0.068 by the Teicholz method), the subaortic velocity time integral rose significantly between days 0 and 8 (12.8cm/s [10-14.5cm/s] vs 15.3cm/s [14.3-16.9cm/s]; P=0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan seems to improve haemodynamics in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy; repeated infusions may delay the need for mechanical circulatory support while awaiting heart transplantation. This therapeutic agent should be systematically considered in this setting, in addition to conventional inotropic drugs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentBiomarkersCarbocyaninesCardiomyopathy, DilatedCardiotonic AgentsChild, PreschoolCreatinineDrug EvaluationFemaleHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansHydrazonesInfantMaleNipecotic AcidsPiperazinesPyridazinesRetrospective StudiesSimendanStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyWaiting Lists