International urogynecology journal · 2011
LeFort colpocleisis and stress incontinence: weighing the risk of voiding dysfunction with sling placement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Aimee L, Karp Deborah R, Lefevre Roger, Aguilar Vivian C, Davila G Willy
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of concomitant suburethral sling with LeFort colpocleisis including its effect on postoperative voiding.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all LeFort colpocleisis procedures from our institution. We reviewed demographics, symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, incontinent events/day, pads usage/day, urodynamic parameters, and presence of voiding dysfunction.
RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients underwent colpocleisis during the study period. Mean age was 82.2 ± 4.9 and median follow-up was 22 weeks (2-169). Preoperatively, 73 (35%) complained of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms, and an additional 105 (50%) were diagnosed with occult SUI. One hundred sixty-one (77%) patients underwent concurrent suburethral sling. Overall, sling placement resulted in a 92.5% subjective stress continent rate. Fifty-six patients presented with voiding dysfunction (VD). Postoperatively, VD resolved in 91%. De novo VD occurred in two patients (1.9%) and one (0.6%) required sling revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Sling placement at time of colpocleisis is associated with high continence rates with minimal risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all LeFort colpocleisis procedures from our institution. We reviewed demographics, symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, incontinent events/day, pads usage/day, urodynamic parameters, and presence of voiding dysfunction.
RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients underwent colpocleisis during the study period. Mean age was 82.2 ± 4.9 and median follow-up was 22 weeks (2-169). Preoperatively, 73 (35%) complained of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms, and an additional 105 (50%) were diagnosed with occult SUI. One hundred sixty-one (77%) patients underwent concurrent suburethral sling. Overall, sling placement resulted in a 92.5% subjective stress continent rate. Fifty-six patients presented with voiding dysfunction (VD). Postoperatively, VD resolved in 91%. De novo VD occurred in two patients (1.9%) and one (0.6%) required sling revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Sling placement at time of colpocleisis is associated with high continence rates with minimal risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction.