MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105772

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Case reports · 2025

Barriers to Cardiogenic Shock Recognition: A Qualitative Analysis.

Adie Sarah K, Stein Adam, Pashun Raymond A, Cantey Eric P, Konerman Matthew C, Koelling Todd M, Steadman Stephanie, Ketcham Scott W

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex heterogeneous syndrome with various causes and phenotypes, making it difficult for clinicians to diagnose. At our institution, we found several cases of missed and late recognition of CS.

PROJECT RATIONALE: Our institutional CS work group interviewed clinicians to identify barriers to CS recognition. Thirty-minute interviews with a series of 6 scripted questions were conducted.

PROJECT SUMMARY: Fifteen interviews were conducted among the following clinicians: cardiology fellow (n = 1), emergency medicine (EM) resident (n = 3), heart failure nurse practitioner (n = 1), general cardiologist (n = 2), EM physician assistant (n = 2), internal medicine resident (n = 3), heart failure cardiologist (n = 1), EM physician (n = 1), and internal medicine physician (n = 1). The top barrier themes that emerged were 1) focus on septic shock management, 2) need for CS-specific training, 3) missed subtle signs of CS, 4) resource allocation, and 5) systems improvement.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: There are several barriers to CS recognition that are common among clinicians. Future research should evaluate how to address these barriers to improve outcomes.

Для цитирования: Adie Sarah K, Stein Adam, Pashun Raymond A, Cantey Eric P, Konerman Matthew C, Koelling Todd M, Steadman Stephanie, Ketcham Scott W. Barriers to Cardiogenic Shock Recognition: A Qualitative Analysis.. JACC. Case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105772.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.