MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 1991

Efficacy of polyacrylamide vs. sodium hyaluronate in cataract surgery.

Mortimer C, Sutton H, Henderson C

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A prospective randomized study was conducted in 137 patients who underwent cataract surgery and implantation of a polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens with either polyacrylamide (Orcolon) (68 patients) or sodium hyaluronate (Healon) (69 patients) as the viscoelastic material. Both viscoelastics were aspirated at the end of surgery. Patients were examined before surgery and 1 and 14 days after surgery. Endothelial cell counts were obtained before surgery and 3 months after surgery in 34 patients (16 in the polyacrylamide group and 18 in the sodium hyaluronate group). There were no reports of a flat or shallow anterior chamber intraoperatively in either group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of corneal edema or iritis on any visit or in endothelial cell loss. Although there was a significant reduction in intraocular pressure across postoperative visits for the overall sample, there was no significant difference in pressure between the polyacrylamide and sodium hyaluronate groups. The results indicate that no untoward effects on corneal edema, endothelial cell count, iritis or intraocular pressure are to be expected when polyacrylamide is used as an aid to cataract surgery.

Для цитирования: Mortimer C, Sutton H, Henderson C. Efficacy of polyacrylamide vs. sodium hyaluronate in cataract surgery.. Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 1991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.