MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02467.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2012

Paediatric follow-up of haemodynamically insignificant congenital cardiac lesions.

Smith Benjamin G, Qureshi Shakeel A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To describe the prevailing follow-up of haemodynamically insignificant congenital cardiac lesions (HICCL) in the UK. To suggest a rationalisation of follow-up based on the known natural history of these lesions.

METHODS

An internet-based survey of 170 paediatric cardiologists and general paediatricians with an interest in cardiology in the UK. Five scenarios concerning common HICCL were presented: ventricular and atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, mild pulmonary stenosis and persistent ductus arteriosus.

RESULTS

There were 52 respondents. There was a broad range of beliefs and practices. However, there were tendencies to discharge children with a patent foramen ovale and follow patients with all other lesions, often on a relatively frequent basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasingly sensitive and advanced nature of echocardiography and the subsequent reliance upon it may be contributing to unnecessarily frequent review of HICCL and a reluctance to discharge patients. In the majority of patients with HICCL, no more than two assessments of HICCL are required after 2 years of age - once in late childhood and once near full growth.

Для цитирования: Smith Benjamin G, Qureshi Shakeel A. Paediatric follow-up of haemodynamically insignificant congenital cardiac lesions.. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02467.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.