Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2026
Development of a symptom assessment scale for moderate-to-severe burn patients in rehabilitation: A Delphi study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qin Qianyu, Deng Yunyun, Li Qinqin, Chen Liying, He Wanling, Li Ting, Tan Huiyi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Burn injuries pose a major global public health challenge, causing significant physical and psychological harm. Comprehensive symptom assessment is critical for the effective rehabilitation of moderate-to-severe burn patients, but existing tools lack specificity for their unique symptom profile during rehabilitation. This study aimed to develop a targeted symptom assessment scale for these patients, addressing the gap in specialized evaluation tools.
METHODS: The Delphi technique was used to determine the content of the Symptom Assessment Scale for Moderate-to-Severe Burn Patients During Rehabilitation (SAS-MBR). Predefined item inclusion criteria were a mean importance score ≥ 3.5, expert consensus (agreement or strong agreement) ≥ 75%, and a coefficient of variation (CV) < 0.25. Two rounds of consultation were conducted with a panel of 25 interdisciplinary burn experts (18 completed both rounds).
RESULTS: After two Delphi rounds, 31 items were retained, categorized into four domains: Scar Characteristics, Systemic Functional Impairment, Psychological & Sleep, and Social Maladjustment. Strong inter-expert agreement was observed (Kendall's W = 0.390, P < 0.001), confirming substantial content validity and consensus on the framework.
CONCLUSION: The SAS-MBR demonstrates good content validity and practicability in assessing symptoms among moderate-to-severe burn patients during rehabilitation. It captures the distinctive challenges of burn rehabilitation and the specific needs in China, further enriching the assessment system for burn care.
METHODS: The Delphi technique was used to determine the content of the Symptom Assessment Scale for Moderate-to-Severe Burn Patients During Rehabilitation (SAS-MBR). Predefined item inclusion criteria were a mean importance score ≥ 3.5, expert consensus (agreement or strong agreement) ≥ 75%, and a coefficient of variation (CV) < 0.25. Two rounds of consultation were conducted with a panel of 25 interdisciplinary burn experts (18 completed both rounds).
RESULTS: After two Delphi rounds, 31 items were retained, categorized into four domains: Scar Characteristics, Systemic Functional Impairment, Psychological & Sleep, and Social Maladjustment. Strong inter-expert agreement was observed (Kendall's W = 0.390, P < 0.001), confirming substantial content validity and consensus on the framework.
CONCLUSION: The SAS-MBR demonstrates good content validity and practicability in assessing symptoms among moderate-to-severe burn patients during rehabilitation. It captures the distinctive challenges of burn rehabilitation and the specific needs in China, further enriching the assessment system for burn care.