Treatment of rectal prolapse.

There are two schools of thought concerning the aetiology of rectal prolapse. On the one hand it was conceived to be a sliding hernia through a defect in the pelvic fascia, while on the other hand radiological studies have demonstrated prolapse to be represented by an intussusception of the rectum. Various operative procedures have been proposed for the treatment of rectal prolapse based on the belief in one or the other of these concepts. The anatomic defects which have been described with prolapse include a defect in the pelvic floor with diastasis of the levatores ani, loss of the normal horizontal position of the rectum, an abnormally deep cul-de-sac of Douglas, a redundant rectosigmoid, and a patulous anal sphincter. The popularly used procedure in Great Britain is that in which a sheet of Ivalon sponge is sutured to the sacrum and wrapped around the rectum thus anchoring it in place. Various authors have reported good results using this technique. The mortality and morbidity rate appear to be acceptable. In the U.S.A. a popular procedure is the Ripstein technique where a sheet of Teflon is wrapped around the rectum anteriorly anchoring the rectum to the sacrum. This technique also has its proponents who rport satisfactory results. Abdominal proctopexy and sigmoid resection, although not in common general use, has been found to be effective with an acceptable morbidity and mortality rate. These three procedures have some drawbacks but the one problem common to all the repairs so far developed for prolapse is their inability to guarantee to restore continence. Probably half the patients operated upon continue to be incontinent. Faradic stimulation of the sphincter has not proved to be as helpful as initially hoped.