MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.016

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2005

Successful treatment of cervical aplasia using a peritoneal graft.

Alborzi S, Momtahan M, Parsanezhad M E, Yazdani M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a peritoneal graft for the treatment of cervical aplasia.

METHOD: Four patients with cervical aplasia who had a functioning endometrium and hematometra were recruited for this clinical trial. Through an abdominoperineal approach a plastic stent was inserted between the endometrial cavity and the upper part of the vagina; then, a graft of peritoneum was applied over the stent. In the absence of a vagina, grafts of skin or amniotic membrane were also used. The plastic stent was removed after 1 month in 2 patients and after 1 week in the 2 other patients.

RESULT: After more than 1 year of observation the 4 patients had regular menstrual cycles with normal menstruation. Sonographic examinations also showed empty uterine cavities.

CONCLUSION

Traditional gynecology textbooks recommend hysterectomy in cases of cervical aplasia. This report presents a new technique with 2 variations using a peritoneal graft. Although both variations were successful in the treatment of cervical aplasia in 4 women, more trials are needed to determine which one should be developed.

Для цитирования: Alborzi S, Momtahan M, Parsanezhad M E, Yazdani M. Successful treatment of cervical aplasia using a peritoneal graft.. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.