Текст сохранён. Часть иллюстраций пока доступна только в первоисточнике; загрузка будет проверена повторно.
Introduction
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a modality that has proven efficacious in the treatment of a wide variety of disorders across different medical disciplines [ 1 ]. It involves the removal of the patient’s plasma that contains pathogenic substances which may aid in halting the disease process and potentially improving clinical outcomes. First, patient’s blood is passed through an external filter to separate plasma from cellular components. The removed plasma is discarded, and replaced with a combination of colloid and crystalloid solutions [ 2 ]. After the removal of plasma, the cellular components and replacement fluid are mixed and returned to the patient.
The most commonly targeted pathogenic substances with TPE are antibodies [ 2 ]. TPE is also believed to modulate the immune system by altering the ratio of T helper type-1 and type-2 cells in the peripheral blood, which interact with antibody-secreting B-cells ultimately impeding antibody production [ 3 ]. Because of these immunological functions, TPE has been established as an important treatment modality in patients with plasma cell disorders, which are characterized by the abundant secretion of non-functional immunoglobulins produced by an abnormally proliferating plasma cell clone [ 4 ]. In certain circumstances, high amounts of the non-functional immunoglobulin can cause various complications necessitating removal via TPE. These scenarios mainly include myeloma cast nephropathy, hyperviscosity syndrome most commonly in the setting of Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and cryoglobulinemia [ 5 , 6 ]. This review summarizes the application of TPE in plasma cell-related disorders and discusses its indications and therapeutic effects in combination with other therapies.
Myeloma cast nephropathy
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults accounting for 17% thereof [ 7 ]. Despite major improvement in survival with the advent of novel agents, MM remains an incurable malignancy [ 8 ]. Renal impairment is a myeloma defining event and seen in up to 50% of patients at initial presentation [ 9 , 10 ]. Myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) is the main etiology of kidney failure and accounts for 30% of all cases [ 11 , 12 ]. MCN has a significant impact on patient outcomes with a median survival of less than a year in those who remain dialysis dependent. A study by Royal et al. showed a strong association between renal recovery (best glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) and overall survival with a hazard ratio of 1.6 per every 15 ml/min/1.73m 2 drop in GRF below 45 ml/min/1.73m 2 [ 13 ]. The pathophysiology of MCN is related to mechanisms mainly involving the monoclonal serum free light chains (sFLC). Free light chains bind to Tamm–Horsfall protein in distal tubules of the kidneys forming toxic casts that result in tubule obstruction and eventually tubular atrophy and fibrosis. In addition, free light chains induce proximal tubular damage by triggering inflammatory changes leading to tubulointersitial fibrosis [ 14 – 16 ]. Therefore, a swift and efficient reduction of sFLC is paramount to mitigate permanent kidney damage and improve patient survival.
Major efforts have been put into studying extracorporeal sFLC removal techniques, most commonly TPE for the treatment of MCN. Current treatment guidelines and expert opinions recommend the rapid institution of plasma cell-directed therapy and consideration of TPE, with the goal of quick reduction in the circulating sFLCs [ 12 , 17 , 18 ]. It has been shown that early reduction in sFLCs is associated with improved renal responses and ultimately OS [ 13 , 19 ]. Previous reports have highlighted favorable outcomes of MM patients with MCN treated with bortezomib-based regimens [ 20 – 27 ]. Three randomized controlled trials of TPE in MCN have been published to date and they were all conducted before the introduction of novel plasma cell-directed agents [ 28 – 30 ]. The role of TPE in the treatment of MCN remains controversial due to inconsistent study results, study design flaws including misrepresentative endpoints, lack of biopsy confirmation, suboptimal concomitant chemotherapy and low statistical power.
The largest randomized study of TPE in MCN was published in 2005 by Clark et al., and included 97 patients with acute kidney injury, 30% of whom were dialysis-dependent [ 30 ]. It randomized patients to cytotoxic therapy consisting of melphalan/prednisone or vincristine/adriamycin/dexamethasone with or without TPE (58 versus 39 patients, respectively). The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of death, dialysis dependence and GFR < 30 ml/min at 6 months. More patients became dialysis independent in the TPE arm (66% versus 50%) but no statistical significance was reached for the difference in primary endpoint (57 versus 69%); overall survival (OS) was also similar at 6 months. The main downsides of this study were the lack of confirmatory kidney biopsies, potentially ineffective cytotoxic therapy, and the use of a composite outcome (death, dialysis dependence or GFR < 30 at 6 months) that may have hindered the efficacy of TPE in improving renal outcomes. The study also performed a fixed number of TPE sessions (5–7) and did not follow sFLC level measurements for guidance on number of required TPE treatments; thus, some patients may have been undertreated.
A small, prospective study by Johnson et al. randomized 21 patients to receive TPE plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. TPE in combination with chemotherapy reduced the sFLC more rapidly than chemotherapy alone. Notably, all three out of the 12 patients in the TPE plus chemotherapy arm who required dialysis, were able to recover their renal function. However, overall renal recovery and overall survival rates were similar between the two arms [ 28 ]. The study was criticized for being underpowered. A retrospective study from Mayo Clinic looked at the role of TPE in 40 patients with MM and renal failure and reported a renal response rate of 45% [ 25 ]. In addition, the study found a correlation between renal recovery (defined as decrease by half in initial serum creatinine and dialysis independence) and the degree of sFLC improvement with TPE (a drop by at least half) in patients with biopsy-confirmed MCN (75% renal recovery) [ 25 ]. Therefore, implementing TPE in only those patients who have biopsy-proven MCN and targeting at least a 50% drop in sFLC may ensure renal recovery and dialysis independence. A meta-analysis of the three above studies showed a significantly lower 6-month dialysis dependence with TPE than chemotherapy alone (15.6% versus 37.2%; risk ratio, 2.02; p = 0.04) [ 31 ]. Again, no difference in OS was noted. Other retrospective studies have found improved renal outcomes with TPE along with bortezomib-based plasma cell-directed therapy in MCN patients as long as a significant reduction in sFLC is achieved [ 24 , 26 ].
Despite the controversial role of TPE in the treatment of MCN, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and American Society of Apheresis (ASFA) do recommend TPE as adjunctive therapy along with plasma cell-directed therapy [ 18 , 32 ]. Our current approach for patients with newly-diagnosed MM and MCN is summarized in Fig. 1 . For patients with sFLC > 1500 mg/L, we start plasma-cell directed therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCd) along with supportive care, daily TPE and serial sFLC checks. If a drop in sFLC by 60% is not achieved after 5 TPE sessions, we favor adding the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab (dara) to VCd and stopping TPE to ensure rapid light chain drop and avoid removal of dara by the apheresis machine. We avoid administering dara simultaneously with TPE due to drug removal by the machine which may hinder its efficacy. For patients with relapsed-refractory MM and MCN, TPE is considered on a case-by-case basis. Future prospective studies should evaluate novel plasma cell-directed therapies with or without TPE for patients with MCN to better delineate the role of TPE for the treatment of MCN especially in the contemporary era of frontline daratumumab use.
Fig. 1 Management of Myeloma Cast Nephropathy. Abbreviations : MCN, myeloma cast nephropathy; sCR, serum creatinin, sFLC, serum free light chains; TPE, therapeutic plasma exchange; SC, subcutaneous; IV, intravenous; PO, oral; dexa, dexamethasone; VCd, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone
Иллюстрация — в первоисточнике ↗
Type I cryoglobulinemia
Cryoglobulinemia (cryo) is a systemic disorder characterized by the presence of cryoglobulins, which are immunoglobulins that precipitate at cold temperatures [ 33 ]. Cryoglobulins may be symptomatic or incidental, and can be monoclonal or polyclonal. They are classified into three categories depending on the type of cryoglobulin isotype and underlying process driving its production and pathogenesis. Type I cryo is usually symptomatic and typically treated by hematologists as it is driven by monoclonal immunoglobulins, most commonly of IgG or IgM isotypes produced by a plasma cell or B cell clone, respectively [ 33 , 34 ]. The clone is benign in most cases as is in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance but could also be malignant (myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia) [ 33 – 35 ]. Notably, severe disease tends to be associated with the IgG isotype more commonly than IgM [ 33 , 35 ]. In type II cryo, the cryoglobulins are a combination of monoclonal IgM with rheumatoid factor activity and polyclonal IgG. It is usually driven by hepatitis C infection but has been also seen in a variety of autoimmune disorders, other infections, and B cell malignancies (not plasma cell disorders). Polyclonal IgM and IgG are the hallmark of type III cryo, typically seen in the setting of infections including hepatitis C, and autoimmune disorders. The following section will discuss the treatment of type I cryo and the role of TPE.
In type I cryo, the clinical manifestations are related to the aggregation of cryoglobulins in small blood vessels leading to obstruction and end-organ damage. This occurs at cold temperatures but could also take place at higher temperatures if the cryoglobulins are present at high concentration. The skin is the most frequently involved organ based on multiple studies including one with 102 patients with type I cryo; peripheral sites (distal extremities, nose and ears) tend to be mostly involved given the associated lower temperatures of those anatomical structures [ 34 , 36 , 37 ]. Purpura and skin ulcers are most common, cyanosis and livedo reticularis are also prevalent [ 33 , 36 , 37 ]. Peripheral neuropathy is present in about a third of the patients, mostly sensory followed by Raynaud’s phenomenon and arthralgias in a quarter of the patients, respectively [ 34 ]. Renal involvement is uncommon (14% of patients) and chiefly presents as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) with proteinuria with or without tubular dysfunction [ 34 ]. The gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, and central nervous system are typically spared in type I cryo [ 33 , 36 , 37 ].
The treatment of type I cryo is generally directed at the underlying lymphoproliferative clone. Thus, clone specific therapy is the mainstay of treatment for most patients. There are no randomized clinical trials that have addressed the role of TPE in the treatment of type I cryo. TPE is effective at reducing circulating cryoglobulin burden and potentially improve symptoms if the latter are indeed related to cryo. Thus, it could be implemented when urgent removal of cryoglobulins is required, typically due to severe disease (such as glomerulonephritis, skin ulcerative disease, and debilitating neuropathy) as shown in case series and cohort studies [ 33 – 37 ]. TPE has a category II indication for the treatment of severe cryo of any type as per ASFA guidelines recommending its use as a second-line treatment, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other systemic therapies including clone-directed therapies [ 32 ]. In addition, TPE could be helpful as sole therapy in frail patients who may not tolerate cytotoxic agents or patients whose disease became refractory to clone-directed therapies.
Our approach at Cleveland Clinic is in line with the ASFA recommendations. In general, we perform daily or every other day one plasma-volume exchanges for a total of five treatments with subsequent clinical and lab evaluation. The frequency of TPE is tailored to each individual patient; we consider maintenance therapy for some patients to help prevent symptom recurrence especially those with advanced renal and neurological involvement [ 32 ]. The cryocrit is the volume of the cryoglobulin precipitate relative to the serum volume and tends to be higher in type I as compared to other cryo types, and dropss with TPE. However, it does not correlate with disease severity [ 32 , 33 ]. Therefore, it is generally not considered a reliable biomarker in deciding when to discontinue TPE. Instead, we typically rely on symptomatology, organ response (especially in kidney and nerve) and disease-specific hematologic response to guide therapy duration.
Hyperviscosity syndrome
Hyperviscosity syndrome (HVS) is a complication of elevated immunoglobulins mostly in the setting of monoclonal disorders [ 38 ], including MM, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM), and cryoglobulinemia. In detail, HVS can be seen in 10–30% of patients with WM associated with IgM paraprotein, and less frequently in MM (2–6%), where it is mainly associated with IgA paraprotein isotype [ 38 , 39 ]. Symptoms of HVS are variable ranging from vision impairment, headache, dizziness or mucosal bleeding to seizures and respiratory failure. In patients with WM, HVS symptomatology typically occurs when IgM levels reach above > 4000 mg/dL and plasma viscosity exceed 4 cp. although it can certainly occur at lower levels. In IgA MM, the paraprotein threshold associated with HVS is usually higher, up to > 6000–7000 mg/dL [ 39 ].
Due to HVS being potentially life-threatening, prompt diagnosis and treatment are critical. When symptomatic hyperviscosity is present, TPE should be immediately started for paraprotein removal along with systemic therapy targeting the underlying malignant cells. Duration of treatment is directed by symptoms and daily or every other day TPE is recommended until symptom improvement [ 40 ]. Commonly, 1–3 TPE sessions are sufficient [ 39 ]. For patients with WM and IgM levels > 4000 mg/dL, prophylactic TPE should be performed prior to receiving rituximab, even in the absence of HVS symptoms, as rituximab can cause a transient IgM increase or “IgM flare” related to its rapid release from the necrotic cancer cells causing emergence or deterioration of existing symptoms [ 40 ]. In these cases, a single TPE session is most often adequate before systemic therapy initiation. Notably, IgM is a mostly intravascular molecule and levels drop remarkably fast with a reduction of blood viscosity from 30 to 70% with each TPE treatment. In some cases, maintenance TPE therapy may be considered to help avoid symptom reemergence especially in patients whose malignancy has become refractory to clone-directed therapies.
Technical notes
At Cleveland Clinic, we use the Spectra Optia® Apheresis System for our TPE procedures. We use citrate (ACD-A) for circuit anticoagulation. The use of anticoagulants is essential to minimize blood coagulation in the extracorporeal circuit. TPE is well-tolerated overall, the main potential side effects are hypocalcemia, fluid shifts and hypotension, vasovagal syncope, transfusion reactions, coagulopathy (hypofibrinogenemia) and electrolyte imbalances [ 41 ]. We perform one plasma volume exchanges and typically use albumin 5% and normal saline for fluid replacement. Plasma is used in certain patients with coagulopathies, bleeding, low fibrinogen, recent surgical procedures or certain disorders that require plasma to address the underlying physiology such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. We administer prophylactic calcium replacement during the treatment and supplement as needed if symptoms of hypocalcemia develop.
Conclusion
TPE is a useful modality in the symptomatic management of a variety of complications associated with plasma cell dyscrasias. It does not address the underlying pathology but can effectively and rapidly remove the pathologic paraprotein, thus temporarily relieving symptoms or reversing organ damage. In the majority of cases, it must be combined with therapy directed against the underlying clone for effective long-term control and prevention of symptom recurrence.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft preparation, - review and editing: Danai Dima and Jack Khouri; Supervision: Jack Khouri. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
Jack Khouri: Consultancy for Janssen.
The rest of the authors have no financial or non-financial potential conflicts of interest.
References
1. Fernández-Zarzoso M Gómez-Seguí I de la Rubia J Therapeutic plasma exchange: review of current indications Transfus Apher Sci 2019 58 3 247 253 10.1016/j.transci.2019.04.007 31023623 Fernández-Zarzoso M, Gómez-Seguí I, de la Rubia J (2019) Therapeutic plasma exchange: review of current indications. Transfus Apher Sci 58(3):247–253 31023623 10.1016/j.transci.2019.04.007
2. Hu Y Yang H Fu S Wu J Therapeutic plasma exchange: for Cancer patients Cancer Manag Res 2022 14 411 425 10.2147/CMAR.S340472 35140519 PMC8818550 Hu Y, Yang H, Fu S, Wu J (2022) Therapeutic plasma exchange: for Cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 14:411–425 35140519 10.2147/CMAR.S340472 PMC8818550
3. The Immunomodulatory Role of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Peripheral Nervous System and Neuromuscular Diseases. 1 [Internet]. 2017 Feb 2 [cited 2024 Feb 10]; Available from: https://touchneurology.com/neuromuscular-diseases/journal-articles/the-immunomodulatory-role-of-therapeutic-plasma-exchange-in-peripheral-nervous-system-and-neuromuscular-diseases/
4. Barlogie B Alexanian R Jagannath S Plasma Cell Dyscrasias JAMA 1992 268 20 2946 2951 1433713 Barlogie B, Alexanian R, Jagannath S (1992) Plasma Cell Dyscrasias JAMA 268(20):2946–2951 1433713
5. Winters JL Plasma exchange: concepts, mechanisms, and an overview of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012 2012 7 12 10.1182/asheducation.V2012.1.7.3797920 23233554 Winters JL (2012) Plasma exchange: concepts, mechanisms, and an overview of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012:7–12 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.7 23233554
6. Reeves HM Winters JL The mechanisms of action of plasma exchange Br J Haematol 2014 164 3 342 351 10.1111/bjh.12629 24172059 Reeves HM, Winters JL (2014) The mechanisms of action of plasma exchange. Br J Haematol 164(3):342–351 24172059 10.1111/bjh.12629
7. Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2020 CA Cancer J Clin 2020 70 1 7 30 10.3322/caac.21590 31912902 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30 31912902 10.3322/caac.21590
8. Dima D Jiang D Singh DJ Hasipek M Shah HS Ullah F Multiple myeloma therapy: emerging trends and challenges Cancers (Basel) 2022 14 17 4082 10.3390/cancers14174082 36077618 PMC9454959 Dima D, Jiang D, Singh DJ, Hasipek M, Shah HS, Ullah F et al (2022) Multiple myeloma therapy: emerging trends and challenges. Cancers (Basel) 14(17):4082 36077618 10.3390/cancers14174082 PMC9454959
9. Sakhuja V Jha V Varma S Joshi K Gupta KL Sud K Renal involvement in multiple myeloma: a 10-year study Ren Fail 2000 22 4 465 477 10.1081/JDI-100100888 10901184 Sakhuja V, Jha V, Varma S, Joshi K, Gupta KL, Sud K et al (2000) Renal involvement in multiple myeloma: a 10-year study. Ren Fail 22(4):465–477 10901184 10.1081/jdi-100100888
10. Rajkumar SV Dimopoulos MA Palumbo A Blade J Merlini G Mateos MV International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma Lancet Oncol 2014 15 12 e538 548 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5 25439696 Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV et al (2014) International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 15(12):e538–548 25439696 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
11. Herrera GA Renal manifestations of plasma cell dyscrasias: an appraisal from the patients’ bedside to the research laboratory Ann Diagn Pathol 2000 4 3 174 200 10.1016/S1092-9134(00)90042-X 10919389 Herrera GA (2000) Renal manifestations of plasma cell dyscrasias: an appraisal from the patients’ bedside to the research laboratory. Ann Diagn Pathol 4(3):174–200 10919389 10.1016/s1092-9134(00)90042-x
12. Leung N Rajkumar SV Multiple myeloma with acute light chain cast nephropathy Blood Cancer J 2023 13 1 1 7 10.1038/s41408-023-00806-w 36990996 PMC10060259 Leung N, Rajkumar SV (2023) Multiple myeloma with acute light chain cast nephropathy. Blood Cancer J 13(1):1–7 36990996 10.1038/s41408-023-00806-w PMC10060259
13. Royal V Leung N Troyanov S Nasr SH Écotière L LeBlanc R Clinicopathologic predictors of renal outcomes in light chain cast nephropathy: a multicenter retrospective study Blood 2020 135 21 1833 1846 10.1182/blood.2019003807 32160635 PMC7243151 Royal V, Leung N, Troyanov S, Nasr SH, Écotière L, LeBlanc R et al (2020) Clinicopathologic predictors of renal outcomes in light chain cast nephropathy: a multicenter retrospective study. Blood 135(21):1833–1846 32160635 10.1182/blood.2019003807 PMC7243151
14. Hutchison CA Batuman V Behrens J Bridoux F Sirac C Dispenzieri A The pathogenesis and diagnosis of acute kidney injury in multiple myeloma Nat Rev Nephrol 2011 8 1 43 51 10.1038/nrneph.2011.168 22045243 PMC3375610 Hutchison CA, Batuman V, Behrens J, Bridoux F, Sirac C, Dispenzieri A et al (2011) The pathogenesis and diagnosis of acute kidney injury in multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Nephrol 8(1):43–51 22045243 10.1038/nrneph.2011.168 PMC3375610
15. Sanders PW Pathogenesis and treatment of myeloma kidney J Lab Clin Med 1994 124 4 484 488 7930873 Sanders PW (1994) Pathogenesis and treatment of myeloma kidney. J Lab Clin Med 124(4):484–488 7930873
16. Hutchison CA Bladé J Cockwell P Cook M Drayson M Fermand JP Novel approaches for reducing free light chains in patients with myeloma kidney Nat Rev Nephrol 2012 8 4 234 243 10.1038/nrneph.2012.14 22349488 Hutchison CA, Bladé J, Cockwell P, Cook M, Drayson M, Fermand JP et al (2012) Novel approaches for reducing free light chains in patients with myeloma kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol 8(4):234–243 22349488 10.1038/nrneph.2012.14
17. Dimopoulos MA Merlini G Bridoux F Leung N Mikhael J Harrison SJ Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group Lancet Oncol 2023 24 7 e293 311 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00223-1 37414019 Dimopoulos MA, Merlini G, Bridoux F, Leung N, Mikhael J, Harrison SJ et al (2023) Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol 24(7):e293–311 37414019 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00223-1
18. Dimopoulos MA Sonneveld P Leung N Merlini G Ludwig H Kastritis E International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Myeloma-related renal impairment J Clin Oncol 2016 34 13 1544 1557 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0044 26976420 Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Leung N, Merlini G, Ludwig H, Kastritis E et al (2016) International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Myeloma-related renal impairment. J Clin Oncol 34(13):1544–1557 26976420 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0044
19. Hutchison CA Cockwell P Stringer S Bradwell A Cook M Gertz MA Early reduction of serum-free light chains associates with renal recovery in myeloma kidney J Am Soc Nephrol 2011 22 6 1129 1136 10.1681/ASN.2010080857 21511832 PMC3103732 Hutchison CA, Cockwell P, Stringer S, Bradwell A, Cook M, Gertz MA et al (2011) Early reduction of serum-free light chains associates with renal recovery in myeloma kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 22(6):1129–1136 21511832 10.1681/ASN.2010080857 PMC3103732
20. Dimopoulos MA Roussou M Gavriatopoulou M Psimenou E Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E Migkou M Bortezomib-based triplets are associated with a high probability of dialysis independence and rapid renal recovery in newly diagnosed myeloma patients with severe renal failure or those requiring dialysis Am J Hematol 2016 91 5 499 502 10.1002/ajh.24335 26890495 Dimopoulos MA, Roussou M, Gavriatopoulou M, Psimenou E, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Migkou M et al (2016) Bortezomib-based triplets are associated with a high probability of dialysis independence and rapid renal recovery in newly diagnosed myeloma patients with severe renal failure or those requiring dialysis. Am J Hematol 91(5):499–502 26890495 10.1002/ajh.24335
21. Burnette BL Leung N Rajkumar SV Renal improvement in myeloma with bortezomib plus plasma exchange N Engl J Med 2011 364 24 2365 2366 10.1056/NEJMc1101834 21675906 Burnette BL, Leung N, Rajkumar SV (2011) Renal improvement in myeloma with bortezomib plus plasma exchange. N Engl J Med 364(24):2365–2366 21675906 10.1056/NEJMc1101834
22. Bridoux F Arnulf B Karlin L Blin N Rabot N Macro M Randomized trial comparing double Versus Triple Bortezomib-based regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and acute kidney Injury due to cast Nephropathy J Clin Oncol 2020 38 23 2647 2657 10.1200/JCO.20.00298 32574117 Bridoux F, Arnulf B, Karlin L, Blin N, Rabot N, Macro M et al (2020) Randomized trial comparing double Versus Triple Bortezomib-based regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and acute kidney Injury due to cast Nephropathy. J Clin Oncol 38(23):2647–2657 32574117 10.1200/JCO.20.00298
23. Szabo AG Thorsen J Iversen KF Hansen CT Teodorescu EM Pedersen SB Clinically-suspected cast nephropathy: a retrospective, national, real-world study Am J Hematol 2020 95 11 1352 1360 10.1002/ajh.25959 32777108 Szabo AG, Thorsen J, Iversen KF, Hansen CT, Teodorescu EM, Pedersen SB et al (2020) Clinically-suspected cast nephropathy: a retrospective, national, real-world study. Am J Hematol 95(11):1352–1360 32777108 10.1002/ajh.25959
24. Sethi J Ramachandran R Malhotra P Nada R Pinnamaneni V Kumar V Plasma exchange in the management of new onset multiple myeloma with cast nephropathy treated with bortezomib based chemotherapy Nephrol (Carlton) 2017 22 12 1035 1036 10.1111/nep.12979 29145704 Sethi J, Ramachandran R, Malhotra P, Nada R, Pinnamaneni V, Kumar V et al (2017) Plasma exchange in the management of new onset multiple myeloma with cast nephropathy treated with bortezomib based chemotherapy. Nephrol (Carlton) 22(12):1035–1036 10.1111/nep.12979 29145704
25. Leung N Gertz MA Zeldenrust SR Rajkumar SV Dispenzieri A Fervenza FC Improvement of cast nephropathy with plasma exchange depends on the diagnosis and on reduction of serum free light chains Kidney Int 2008 73 11 1282 1288 10.1038/ki.2008.108 18385667 Leung N, Gertz MA, Zeldenrust SR, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Fervenza FC et al (2008) Improvement of cast nephropathy with plasma exchange depends on the diagnosis and on reduction of serum free light chains. Kidney Int 73(11):1282–1288 18385667 10.1038/ki.2008.108
26. Premuzic V Batinic J Roncevic P Basic-Jukic N Nemet D Jelakovic B Role of Plasmapheresis in the management of Acute kidney Injury in patients with multiple myeloma: should we abandon it? Ther Apher Dial 2018 22 1 79 86 10.1111/1744-9987.12606 29239143 Premuzic V, Batinic J, Roncevic P, Basic-Jukic N, Nemet D, Jelakovic B (2018) Role of Plasmapheresis in the management of Acute kidney Injury in patients with multiple myeloma: should we abandon it? Ther Apher Dial 22(1):79–86 29239143 10.1111/1744-9987.12606
27. Mizuno S Kitayama C Mashiko S Sanada S Renal recovery following daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in a patient with newly diagnosed dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma CEN Case Rep 2022 11 2 265 268 10.1007/s13730-021-00668-w 34817845 PMC9061908 Mizuno S, Kitayama C, Mashiko S, Sanada S (2022) Renal recovery following daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in a patient with newly diagnosed dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma. CEN Case Rep 11(2):265–268 34817845 10.1007/s13730-021-00668-w PMC9061908
28. Johnson WJ Kyle RA Pineda AA O’Brien PC Holley KE Treatment of renal failure associated with multiple myeloma. Plasmapheresis, hemodialysis, and chemotherapy Arch Intern Med 1990 150 4 863 869 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390160111022 2183734 Johnson WJ, Kyle RA, Pineda AA, O’Brien PC, Holley KE (1990) Treatment of renal failure associated with multiple myeloma. Plasmapheresis, hemodialysis, and chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med 150(4):863–869 2183734
29. Zucchelli P Pasquali S Cagnoli L Ferrari G Controlled plasma exchange trial in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma Kidney Int 1988 33 6 1175 1180 10.1038/ki.1988.127 3043077 Zucchelli P, Pasquali S, Cagnoli L, Ferrari G (1988) Controlled plasma exchange trial in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma. Kidney Int 33(6):1175–1180 3043077 10.1038/ki.1988.127
30. Clark WF Stewart AK Rock GA Sternbach M Sutton DM Barrett BJ Plasma exchange when myeloma presents as acute renal failure: a randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med 2005 143 11 777 784 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00005 16330788 Clark WF, Stewart AK, Rock GA, Sternbach M, Sutton DM, Barrett BJ et al (2005) Plasma exchange when myeloma presents as acute renal failure: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 143(11):777–784 16330788 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00005
31. Yu X Gan L Wang Z Dong B Chen X Chemotherapy with or without plasmapheresis in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015 53 5 391 397 10.5414/CP202245 25816886 Yu X, Gan L, Wang Z, Dong B, Chen X (2015) Chemotherapy with or without plasmapheresis in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 53(5):391–397 25816886 10.5414/CP202245
32. Padmanabhan A Connelly-Smith L Aqui N Balogun RA Klingel R Meyer E Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice - evidence-based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the Eighth Special Issue J Clin Apher 2019 34 3 171 354 10.1002/jca.21705 31180581 Padmanabhan A, Connelly-Smith L, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Klingel R, Meyer E et al (2019) Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice - evidence-based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the Eighth Special Issue. J Clin Apher 34(3):171–354 31180581 10.1002/jca.21705
33. Muchtar E Magen H Gertz MA How I treat cryoglobulinemia Blood 2017 129 3 289 298 10.1182/blood-2016-09-719773 27799164 Muchtar E, Magen H, Gertz MA (2017) How I treat cryoglobulinemia. Blood 129(3):289–298 27799164 10.1182/blood-2016-09-719773
34. Sidana S Rajkumar SV Dispenzieri A Lacy MQ Gertz MA Buadi FK Clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with type 1 monoclonal cryoglobulinemia Am J Hematol 2017 92 7 668 673 10.1002/ajh.24745 28370486 PMC5579826 Sidana S, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK et al (2017) Clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with type 1 monoclonal cryoglobulinemia. Am J Hematol 92(7):668–673 28370486 10.1002/ajh.24745 PMC5579826
35. Néel A Perrin F Decaux O Dejoie T Tessoulin B Halliez M Long-term outcome of monoclonal (type 1) cryoglobulinemia Am J Hematol 2014 89 2 156 161 10.1002/ajh.23608 24532335 Néel A, Perrin F, Decaux O, Dejoie T, Tessoulin B, Halliez M et al (2014) Long-term outcome of monoclonal (type 1) cryoglobulinemia. Am J Hematol 89(2):156–161 24532335 10.1002/ajh.23608
36. Harel S Mohr M Jahn I Aucouturier F Galicier L Asli B Clinico-biological characteristics and treatment of type I monoclonal cryoglobulinaemia: a study of 64 cases Br J Haematol 2015 168 5 671 678 10.1111/bjh.13196 25363150 Harel S, Mohr M, Jahn I, Aucouturier F, Galicier L, Asli B et al (2015) Clinico-biological characteristics and treatment of type I monoclonal cryoglobulinaemia: a study of 64 cases. Br J Haematol 168(5):671–678 25363150 10.1111/bjh.13196
37. Terrier B Karras A Kahn JE Le Guenno G Marie I Benarous L The spectrum of type I cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: new insights based on 64 cases Med (Baltim) 2013 92 2 61 68 10.1097/MD.0b013e318288925c PMC4553985 23429354 Terrier B, Karras A, Kahn JE, Le Guenno G, Marie I, Benarous L et al (2013) The spectrum of type I cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: new insights based on 64 cases. Med (Baltim) 92(2):61–68 10.1097/MD.0b013e318288925c PMC4553985 23429354
38. Gertz MA Acute hyperviscosity: syndromes and management Blood 2018 132 13 1379 1385 10.1182/blood-2018-06-846816 30104220 PMC6161773 Gertz MA (2018) Acute hyperviscosity: syndromes and management. Blood 132(13):1379–1385 30104220 10.1182/blood-2018-06-846816 PMC6161773
39. Connelly-Smith L Alquist CR Aqui NA Hofmann JC Klingel R Onwuemene OA Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice - evidence-based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the Ninth Special Issue J Clin Apher 2023 38 2 77 278 10.1002/jca.22043 37017433 Connelly-Smith L, Alquist CR, Aqui NA, Hofmann JC, Klingel R, Onwuemene OA et al (2023) Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice - evidence-based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the Ninth Special Issue. J Clin Apher 38(2):77–278 37017433 10.1002/jca.22043
40. Gertz MA Waldenström macroglobulinemia 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management Am J Hematol 2023 98 2 348 358 10.1002/ajh.26796 36588395 PMC10249724 Gertz MA, Waldenström macroglobulinemia (2023) 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 98(2):348–358 36588395 10.1002/ajh.26796 PMC10249724
41. Kaplan AA Therapeutic plasma exchange: a technical and operational review J Clin Apher 2013 28 1 3 10 10.1002/jca.21257 23420589 Kaplan AA (2013) Therapeutic plasma exchange: a technical and operational review. J Clin Apher 28(1):3–10 23420589 10.1002/jca.21257